2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2011.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The 4th international comparison on EPR dosimetry with tooth enamel

Abstract: This paper presents the results of the 4th International Comparison of in vitro electron paramagnetic resonance dosimetry with tooth enamel, where the performance parameters of tooth enamel dosimetry methods were compared among sixteen laboratories from all over the world. The participating laboratories were asked to determine a calibration curve with a set of tooth enamel powder samples provided by the organizers. Nine molar teeth extracted following medical indication from German donors and collected between… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This method uses enamel samples prepared from teeth extracted according to medical indications. The error of determination of absorbed dose by this method is about 30-50 mGy [8][9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…This method uses enamel samples prepared from teeth extracted according to medical indications. The error of determination of absorbed dose by this method is about 30-50 mGy [8][9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…All samples were treated by hard alloy dental drills and diamond saws by separating the enamel from the dentine after the cutting of each tooth sample to buccal and lingual parts [15,17]. Dentins were removed carefully in order to prevent the sample from heating which can induce an additional EPR signal and significantly change shape of the signal [18][19][20].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EPR dosimetry is one of the useful tools for such dose reconstruction [14,15]. This method can determine the radiation doses retrospectively even more than 40 years after the exposure event.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This analysis was performed for all beams. Using the 2 the values of the MDD obtained are calculated and reported in Table 1Furthermore, the values of the critical level of dose D CL and the detection limit of dose D DL were calculated following the procedure described for samples of tooth enamel [71] (see Table 1). The values of the detection limit of dose D DL are comparable with those calculated with the other procedure above described and therefore the estimations of these detection limits are reliable.…”
Section: Dose Sensitivity and Minimum Detectable Dosementioning
confidence: 99%