1989
DOI: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1989.tb03443.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The 5′ flanking region of the pS2 gene contains a complex enhancer region responsive to oestrogens, epidermal growth factor, a tumour promoter (TPA), the c-Ha-ras oncoprotein and the c-jun protein.

Abstract: Expression of the pS2 gene which is transcriptionally controlled by oestrogens in the breast cancer cell line MCF‐7 is oestrogen independent in stomach mucosa. We show here that the level of MCF‐7 cell pS2 mRNA can also be increased by the tumour promoter 12‐O‐tetradecanoylphorbol‐13‐acetate (TPA). We further demonstrate, using transient transfection assays, that the −428 to −332 5′ flanking sequence of the pS2 gene contains DNA enhancer elements responsive to oestrogens, TPA, EGF, the c‐Ha‐ras oncoprotein and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
117
0
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 250 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
2
117
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To analyse whether treatment of breast cancer cells with PRL could also induce the recruitment of ERa and P-Ser-118-ERa to the target promoter, we performed chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays in a-amanitin-synchronized populations of cells to compare pS2 promoter occupancy by the receptor in T47D cells incubated with PRL or E2. As shown in Figure 4, E2 recruited ERa to the pS2 promoter region containing the ERE and known to be required for E2 regulation of transcription (Nunez et al, 1989). This binding increased at 40 min and then decreased, in agreement with data obtained in other breast cancer cell line (MCF-7), where ERa recruitment to the promoter is cyclical (Shang et al, 2000;Metivier et al, 2003).…”
Section: Prl-dependent Activation Of Unliganded Ersupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To analyse whether treatment of breast cancer cells with PRL could also induce the recruitment of ERa and P-Ser-118-ERa to the target promoter, we performed chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays in a-amanitin-synchronized populations of cells to compare pS2 promoter occupancy by the receptor in T47D cells incubated with PRL or E2. As shown in Figure 4, E2 recruited ERa to the pS2 promoter region containing the ERE and known to be required for E2 regulation of transcription (Nunez et al, 1989). This binding increased at 40 min and then decreased, in agreement with data obtained in other breast cancer cell line (MCF-7), where ERa recruitment to the promoter is cyclical (Shang et al, 2000;Metivier et al, 2003).…”
Section: Prl-dependent Activation Of Unliganded Ersupporting
confidence: 88%
“…To determine the effect of PRL on endogenous ERdependent gene expression, we analysed transcripts for the well-known estrogen target gene pS2, containing EREs in its regulatory region (Nunez et al, 1989). PRL significantly induced pS2 mRNA levels in T47D cells (Figure 2a), without increasing ERa mRNA levels (Figure 2b).…”
Section: Prl-dependent Activation Of Unliganded Ermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5), RhoGDIa differentially modulates the expression of the PR and pS2 genes, which have very different cis elements and trans-acting factors involved in conferring their hormone responsiveness. While the pS2 gene contains an imperfect ERE that interacts directly with ERa (Nunez et al 1989), the PR gene contains multiple AP-1 and Sp1 sites through which AP-1 and Sp1 proteins interact with ERa (Jeltsch et al 1987, Petz et al 2002, 2004a,b, Schultz et al 2003. Thus, we believe that the ability of RhoGDIa to differentially alter estrogen-responsive gene expression may be due to differences in the population of cis elements and the trans-acting factors associated with various target genes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, the human pS2 promoter contains binding sites for ERs as well as AP-1 transcription factors (78), indicating that expression of this gene, which had previously been demonstrated to be activated by cAMP in an ICI 164,384-inhibited manner, might involve cross-talk between ER and AP-1. Unexpectedly, pS2-CAT was not activated by ER␣ or ER␤ in response to forskolin/ IBMX treatment.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 96%