2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2015.05.012
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The 5Cs of Consultation: Training Medical Students to Communicate Effectively in the Emergency Department

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
29
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings contribute to a robust needs assessment of telephone talk in postgraduate medical education and complement existing approaches based on mnemonics or cognitive aids (Haig et al 2006;Podolsky et al 2015;Kessler et al 2015). Our study extends this prior work by delineating explicit and informal educational elements of these telephone conversation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Our findings contribute to a robust needs assessment of telephone talk in postgraduate medical education and complement existing approaches based on mnemonics or cognitive aids (Haig et al 2006;Podolsky et al 2015;Kessler et al 2015). Our study extends this prior work by delineating explicit and informal educational elements of these telephone conversation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…-5C'S of calling a consult (Kessler et al 2015 Focus the debriefing on strategies that promote learners to assess their own performance and include reflective questions about potential PRI in order to make the implicit explicit.…”
Section: Overview Of An Example Simulation Scenariomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A total of 434 papers and abstracts satisfied the search criteria, and 61 papers met the inclusion criteria . The authors scored these 61 manuscripts, and the 10 highest scoring quantitative and two qualitative articles are reviewed below, in alphabetical order by first author's last name.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%