2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-008-0183-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The 76-gene signature defines high-risk patients that benefit from adjuvant tamoxifen therapy

Abstract: The 76-gene signature defines high-risk patients who benefit from adjuvant tamoxifen therapy. Although we did not study the value of chemotherapy in this study, low-risk patients identified by the 76-gene signature have a prognosis good enough that chemotherapy would be difficult to justify. The prognosis of these patients is sufficiently good, in fact, that a disease-free benefit for tamoxifen therapy is difficult to prove, though benefits in terms of loco-regional relapse and a reduction in risk for contrala… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
95
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
95
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We included 238 of our own samples (datasets Frankfurt, Frankfurt-2, and Frankfurt-3) which have been described previously (Ahr et al 2002 [9], [10], Rody et al 2008 [11], Ruckhäberle et al 2008 [12], and Rody et al 2007 [13], respectively) as well as 2792 samples from 22 different publicly available datasets (Table 1): Rotterdam [14][15][16], Mainz [17], Trans-BIG [18], Oxford-Untreated [19], London [20], London-2 [21], Oxford-Tamoxifen, Veridex-Tam [22], Stockholm [23], Uppsala [24,25], San Francisco [26], New York [27], MDA133 [28], EORTC [29], Edinburgh [30], ExpO [31], Signapore [32], Genentech [33], Boston [34], Berlin [35], Paris [36], and Tampa [37]. For comparability, only the ProbeSets from the Affymetrix HG-U133A microarray were used from seven datasets where HG-U133?…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We included 238 of our own samples (datasets Frankfurt, Frankfurt-2, and Frankfurt-3) which have been described previously (Ahr et al 2002 [9], [10], Rody et al 2008 [11], Ruckhäberle et al 2008 [12], and Rody et al 2007 [13], respectively) as well as 2792 samples from 22 different publicly available datasets (Table 1): Rotterdam [14][15][16], Mainz [17], Trans-BIG [18], Oxford-Untreated [19], London [20], London-2 [21], Oxford-Tamoxifen, Veridex-Tam [22], Stockholm [23], Uppsala [24,25], San Francisco [26], New York [27], MDA133 [28], EORTC [29], Edinburgh [30], ExpO [31], Signapore [32], Genentech [33], Boston [34], Berlin [35], Paris [36], and Tampa [37]. For comparability, only the ProbeSets from the Affymetrix HG-U133A microarray were used from seven datasets where HG-U133?…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1C, Supplementary Table S1B; refs. [30][31][32][33][34]. Kaplan-Meier survival plots (KMplots) of tamoxifen-treated ER-positive patients indicate that increased RRM2 expression is strongly correlated with reduced RFS and OS ( Fig.…”
Section: Rrm2 Expression Inversely Correlates With Er Expression In Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gene expression signature predicts that 70-80% of these patients are unlikely to develop metastasis, so these patients are currently overtreated. Several other gene expression profiles predict recurrence and overall survival and/or tamoxifen resistance (Ma et al 2004, Paik et al 2004, Jansen et al 2005, Wang et al 2005, Frasor et al 2006, Oh et al 2006, Gräf et al 2007, Chanrion et al 2008, Kok et al 2009, Lippman et al 2008, Zhang et al 2009). …”
Section: Era Target Genes and Breast Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%