2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2009.11.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The ABC of complementary products mergers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides, he examines how the mergers impact the incentives for R&D in the long run. A similar model is presented by Anderson et al (2010) in which it is shown under which circumstances the merger is profitable for the merging parties and under which conditions it may lead to competitive harm. Both models assume that there are no cost synergies and instead, the incentives for the merger arise from the internalization of profits.…”
Section: Relation To the Literaturementioning
confidence: 91%
“…Besides, he examines how the mergers impact the incentives for R&D in the long run. A similar model is presented by Anderson et al (2010) in which it is shown under which circumstances the merger is profitable for the merging parties and under which conditions it may lead to competitive harm. Both models assume that there are no cost synergies and instead, the incentives for the merger arise from the internalization of profits.…”
Section: Relation To the Literaturementioning
confidence: 91%
“…Choi (2008), assuming that the merged firm engages in mixed bundling, builds on Economides and Salop (1992) to find cases where an exogenous merger, which is always privately profitable, is socially detrimental. We further delve into the idea developed by Anderson et al (2010), where a merger of complements is profitable under some conditions (depending on the shape of the demand function) in the presence of competition. 2 Our model complements and extends these contributions.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Fridolfsson and Stennek () the merger, although unprofitable, may increase the stock exchange value of the firm. In Anderson et al (), a merger of complements is profitable in a competitive scenario depending on the shape of the demand function.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%