We read with interest the article by Baiges et al., (1) which shed light on the rare entity of the Abernethy malformation and gives a working algorithm for extrahepatic shunts. We commend all the researchers for the effort to put together a large series and have a follow-up up to the age of 30 years, missed by previous series.The researchers have shown how shunt closure can be considered in therapeutic and prophylactic settings to reduce complications. However, the researchers have not given us details on the precise anatomy of the shunts they saw in the series. This is important in planning an intervention.The Abernethy malformation is commonly described as the shunting of splanchnic blood into the systemic venous network by abnormal communications. The Abernethy malformation is anatomically classified as a type 1 (Ia)-splenic and superior mesenteric vein draining separately in the inferior vena cava (IVC) and (Ib) draining though a common trunk. Type 2 is classified as a shunt from the portal vein (PV) to IVC. (1,2) The Kobayashi classification describes types A, B, and C of portal blood flowing directly into the IVC, renal vein, and iliac vein, respectively. Blanc et al. classified the congenital extrahepatic portosystemic shunt considering the starting as well as the end point of the shunt. (2,3) Based on our clinical observations, we believe the Abernathy malformation can also result in, portal blood being shunted directly into the right atrium (RA), although has not been described in any of the previous classifications. Hence, we believe this is a description of a porta-atrial shunt. This should perhaps be incorporated into the current classifications, and also also provides an opportunity to further understand hepatic vascular embryology, malformations, and their clinical spectrum. Moreover, such large shunts with direct communication with the RA may not be amenable to the usual radiological interventions.