The ABILHAND Questionnaire as a Measure of Manual Ability in Chronic Stroke Patients

Abstract

Background and Purpose-Chronic hemiparetic patients often retain the ability to manage activities requiring both hands, either through the use of the affected arm or compensation with the unaffected limb. A measure of this overall ability was developed by adapting and validating the ABILHAND questionnaire through the Rasch measurement model. ABILHAND measures the patient's perceived difficulty in performing everyday manual activities. Methods-One hundred three chronic (Ͼ6 months) stroke outpatients (62% men; mean age, 63 years) were assessed (74 in Belgium, 29 in Italy). They lived at home and walked independently and were screened for the absence of major cognitive deficits (dementia, aphasia, hemineglect). The patients were administered the ABILHAND questionnaire, the Brunnström upper limb motricity test, the box-and-block manual dexterity test, the Semmes-Weinstein tactile sensation test, and the Geriatric Depression Scale. The brain lesion type and site were recorded. ABILHAND results were analyzed with the use of Winsteps Rasch software. Results-The Rasch refinement of ABILHAND led to a change from the original unimanual and bimanual 56-item, 4-level scale to a bimanual 23-item, 3-level scale. The resulting ability scale had sufficient sensitivity to be clinically useful. Rasch reliability was 0.90, and the item-difficulty hierarchy was stable across demographic and clinical subgroups. Grip strength, motricity, dexterity, and depression were significantly correlated with the ABILHAND measures. Key Words: arm Ⅲ disability evaluation Ⅲ rehabilitation Ⅲ stroke P oststroke hemiplegia is one of the most prevalent forms of motor disability, affecting approximately 1% of the population. 1 Although most current stroke survivors achieve an autonomous form of gait, a satisfactory recovery (if any) of the affected upper limb function is much more rare. Conclusions-TheAlthough several tests are available 2-4 for measuring upper limb function in terms of grip strength, dexterity, sensation, and performance in standardized manipulative tasks, the measurements are all made at the focal impairment level. 5 The actual disability, however, is far from linearly related to the underlying impairments. 6 It depends on complex interactions between upper limb function and compensatory behaviors of the person, such as using the unaffected limb or dividing complex movements into simpler ones. Moreover, the learning of new motor processes is influenced by the subject's motivational and emotional status, which is likely to be impaired by stroke. 7 Manual ability may be defined as the capacity to manage daily activities requiring the use of the upper limbs, whatever the strategies involved. Therefore, it should be measured per se and not simply inferred from focal impairments. Since it is a behavior, manual ability belongs to the domain of latent variables concealed within the person, such as pain, depression, and intelligence. The "amount" of manual ability can be inferred from observed activities and/or a patient's perceived difficul...

Test‐Retest Reliability of the ABILHAND Questionnaire in Persons With Chronic Stroke

“…It was initially developed and validated for persons with rheumatoid arthritis [16] and then for persons with chronic stroke [17] as well as for several other diagnosis [18][19][20][21][22]. The ABILHAND Questionnaire is reliable in a test-retest situation in persons with rheumatoid arthritis and in persons with systemic sclerosis [19,23,24].…”

ABILOCO: A Rasch-Built 13-Item Questionnaire to Assess Locomotion Ability in Stroke Patients

“…23 The ability of patients to participate in the study was established by the rehabilitation team taking care of the patient on a daily basis. These rehabilitation professionals were familiar with the ability of the patient to understand and fill out the questionnaire.…”

“…If the P value was less than .05, the item did not fit the unidimensionality criterion and was eliminated. 23 The fourth criterion was the differential item functioning (DIF) test. The lack of variance in the item difficulty hierarchy among patient subgroups was tested.…”

Constraint Induced Movement Therapy and Real-World Arm Use in Children With Hemiparesis

“…In addition to it reports the collaboration of both hands together: it is not an assessment of each hand separately. It looks for the children's manual ability to 'handle object(s) in daily life that are relevant and age appropriate for the child [16].…”