2005
DOI: 10.1080/00219266.2005.9655963
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The ability of A-level students to name plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
123
0
24

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 185 publications
(155 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
8
123
0
24
Order By: Relevance
“…The observed low ability to recognize and identify plant species among students is not unique for this particular age group neither for Portuguese students, since the knowledge of students about identification of plants is equally low in other countries (Bebbington, 2005;Schussler & Olzak, 2008;Strgar, 2007). This inability was also observed when students were asked to distinguish between native and invasive plants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The observed low ability to recognize and identify plant species among students is not unique for this particular age group neither for Portuguese students, since the knowledge of students about identification of plants is equally low in other countries (Bebbington, 2005;Schussler & Olzak, 2008;Strgar, 2007). This inability was also observed when students were asked to distinguish between native and invasive plants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…California children (n=12) taken on a plant walk around the University of California Botanical Gardens displayed extremely limited knowledge of plants (Dougherty 1979). America's knowledge deficit is not unique; researchers in the United Kingdom found that 86% of biology students were unable to identify more than three common wildflowers, and 41% could name only one, or none (Bebbington 2005). Studies conducted in Switzerland and Germany corroborate this low level of ecoliteracy in developed nations (LindemannMatthies 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even if it is counterbalanced by the wide availability of photographic identification guides, it indicates a decrease in the connection children and illustrators have with the countryside, the end-product of a process dubbed the "devolution" of ethnobotanical knowledge (Atran et al 2004, Wolff et al 1999. This low level of botanical knowledge amongst children has been documented both in Britain (Bebbington 2005) and the USA. (Cooper 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such knowledge and its use are largely extinct now due to the fact that children are no longer used as shepherds (Łuczaj 2008). This kind of decrease in popular botanical knowledge seems to be a global trend (e.g., Atran et al 2004, Bebbington 2005, Cooper 2008, Wolff et al 1999. In this present day reality a large proportion of the contact which children have with nature is vicarious (based on watching television, reading books etc).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%