2007
DOI: 10.1177/0269215506071288
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The ability of the Biodex Stability System to distinguish level of function in subjects with a second-degree ankle sprain

Abstract: The one-leg stance protocol carried out in the dynamic limit-of-stability mode is very challenging and offers a very limited capacity to differentiate between injured and non-injured limbs. The main outcome of the Stability System does not appear to be a good indicator of the functional capacity of people with a lateral ankle sprain.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that a higher score indicates poorer balance. 24 To investigate the effect of the intervention, the mean changes in the sum of the OSI, APSI, and MLSI in each group were calculated from baseline during both situations (eyes open and eyes closed) of the static and dynamic test conditions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that a higher score indicates poorer balance. 24 To investigate the effect of the intervention, the mean changes in the sum of the OSI, APSI, and MLSI in each group were calculated from baseline during both situations (eyes open and eyes closed) of the static and dynamic test conditions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an attempt to provide a more dynamic environment, similar to natural conditions that result in ankle instability, some researchers assess postural performance using the BSS in patients with ankle sprain. 19,22,26 The results of these latter studies indicate that the greater the difficulty levels of testing, the larger the difference in balance performance between the injured and contralateral noninjured limbs 26 or between the group with ankle instability and the control group. 19,22 For instance, Rozzi et al 22 compared single-limb stance performance on the BSS in 13 subjects with FAI and 13 control individuals.…”
Section: Level Of Postural Difficultymentioning
confidence: 94%
“…19,22,26 The results of these latter studies indicate that the greater the difficulty levels of testing, the larger the difference in balance performance between the injured and contralateral noninjured limbs 26 or between the group with ankle instability and the control group. 19,22 For instance, Rozzi et al 22 compared single-limb stance performance on the BSS in 13 subjects with FAI and 13 control individuals. Similar to our findings, the subjects with FAI demonstrated a significantly poorer postural stability for OSI compared to the subjects in the control group, when standing on a less stable platform (stability level 2).…”
Section: Level Of Postural Difficultymentioning
confidence: 94%
“…A higher score in each index, such as MLSI, indicates poor balance. It is believed that the OSI score is the best indicator of the overall patient ability to maintain balance on the free platform (22).…”
Section: Stability Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%