2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.archger.2012.08.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The ability to modulate peripersonal and extrapersonal reach space via tool use among the elderly

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, our sample is age-matched with the patient, and thus much older than previously tested populations of healthy subjects. We note that increase in age has been shown to affect multisensory integration and peri-and extrapersonal space representation (Bloesch et al, 2013;Caçola et al, 2013;Ghafouri and Lestienne, 2000;Lepelley et al, 2010;Mahoney et al, 2011). Even if these cited studies included participants older than the present age-matched participants, the findings are in line with the idea that increased age affects the integration of multisensory information.…”
Section: Self-locationsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…First, our sample is age-matched with the patient, and thus much older than previously tested populations of healthy subjects. We note that increase in age has been shown to affect multisensory integration and peri-and extrapersonal space representation (Bloesch et al, 2013;Caçola et al, 2013;Ghafouri and Lestienne, 2000;Lepelley et al, 2010;Mahoney et al, 2011). Even if these cited studies included participants older than the present age-matched participants, the findings are in line with the idea that increased age affects the integration of multisensory information.…”
Section: Self-locationsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The same distortion is not present above the knee because in this body zone the audio feedback of movements isn’t present and multisensory integration is similar to the upper body part where the sensory-motor training with ABBI is useful for spatial recalibration (Finocchietti et al, 2017 ). As regard the spatial areas considered, several studies indicate that space is processed differently depending both: the body part considered (Serino et al, 2015 ; di Pellegrino and Làdavas, 2015 ) and on the distance from the body (Làdavas and Farnè, 2004 ; Aimola et al, 2012 ; Tomasino et al, 2012 ; Caçola et al, 2013 ; Mahayana et al, 2014 ). Other studies have found a difference between frontal and rear space (Kóbor et al, 2006 ; Occelli et al, 2011 ; Van der Stoep et al, 2015 ), showing a higher saliency of sounds in the back (Farnè and Làdavas, 2002 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The apparatus and procedures described here are equivalent to the ones used by Caçola and Gabbard 1 and Caçola, Martinez, and Ray 9 . Fig.…”
Section: Apparatusmentioning
confidence: 99%