The abject of entrepreneurship: failure, fiasco, fraud

Abstract

Purpose – Failure as an integral part of the entrepreneurial process has recently become a hot topic. The purpose of this paper is to review this debate as expressed both in research on entrepreneurship and in the public discourse, in order to understand what kind of failure is being incorporated into the entrepreneurship discourse and what is being repressed. Design/methodology/approach – The research design is twofold: an empirical investigation modelled as a discourse analysis is followed by a psychoanalytically inspired deconstruction of the identified hegemony. Where the discourse analysis treats what is omitted, the purpose of the psychoanalytic analysis is to point out more concretely what is being repressed from the hegemonic discourses that the first part of the paper identified. Findings – The paper identifies a discursive shift from focusing on entrepreneurial success while at the same time negating failure, to embracing failure as a “learning experience”. Second, we trace this “fail better”-movement and identify a distinction between the “good failure” from which the entrepreneur learns, and the “bad failure” which may also imply a moral breakdown. Finally, the paper attempts to deconstruct this discourse deploying Kristeva's idea of the abject. The paper argues that the entrepreneurship discourse seeks closure through abjecting its own, real kernel, namely: the everyday, common, entrepreneurial failure. This image comprises the abject of entrepreneurship, and abject which does becomes visible, however, rarely: Bernie Madoff, Jeff Skilling, Stein Bagger. Originality/value – This paper fulfils an identified need to study the darker and unwanted sides of entrepreneurship and extends our understanding of failure in entrepreneurial processes.

The Individual-Care Nexus: A Theory of Entrepreneurial Care for Sustainable Entrepreneurship

“…We urge sustainable entrepreneurship researchers to pay attention to the plethora of emotions present in entrepreneurial practice and how they are manifested within sustainable entrepreneurs over time, but perhaps without discussing them in relation to rational or irrational aspects of decision-making. Neither should they be too quick to link examples of failed entrepreneurship [97] to periods of negative emotions and vice versa. Instead, they must acknowledge that all kinds of emotions are evoked by, and have a performative effect on, entrepreneurial practice.…”

Traversing the fantasy of the heroic entrepreneur

“…While particular entrepreneurs have failed, the 'entrepreneurial dream lives on!' (Tedmanson.et al, 2012: 532; see also Olaison and Sørensen, 2014). Even through his glorious failures, the entrepreneur shows that failure marks the path of the righteous, making him the redeemer of the economy .…”

The Change Laboratory for Teacher Training in Entrepreneurship Education

“…Moreover, it should be considered that up to 90% of the start-ups fail die within the first 5 years of life. Only recently scholars have started investigating the 'dark side' of entrepreneurship-failure-by studying the two sides of it: fiascos and frauds (Olaison & Meier Sørensen, 2014). For Tedmanson, Essers, Dey, and Verduyn (2015), entrepreneurship can be studied as two-sided edge phenomenon encompassing oppression and emancipation that stand in a dialectic relationship.…”