2019
DOI: 10.1513/annalsats.201810-654cc
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Absent Sinusoid Sign

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Certain features have been described that may hint at a non-expandable lung. On m-mode in usual pleural effusion, the lung can be seen making a sinusoidal pattern; this has been noted to be lost in non-expandable lungs, known as the "absent sinusoidal sign" [ 9 ]. Along with the absent sinusoidal sign, other common bedside ultrasound findings are usually pleural thickening, pleural nodularity, and loculated effusion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Certain features have been described that may hint at a non-expandable lung. On m-mode in usual pleural effusion, the lung can be seen making a sinusoidal pattern; this has been noted to be lost in non-expandable lungs, known as the "absent sinusoidal sign" [ 9 ]. Along with the absent sinusoidal sign, other common bedside ultrasound findings are usually pleural thickening, pleural nodularity, and loculated effusion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, identifying NEL prior to definitive intervention would be of benefit as first-line IPC is the optimal choice in these cases. Noninvasive techniques that can forecast its probability include TUS identification of an absent sinusoid sign (a dynamic sonographic M-mode finding indicating motion of atelectatic lung during respiration within pleural fluid) and reduced motion of the atelectatic lung [ 160 162 ].…”
Section: Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The absent “sinusoid sign” ultrasound finding described in Ultrasound Reflections, if validated, provides a valuable noninvasive method to predict patients with a trapped lung (1). At this time, the gold standard for the diagnosis is the use of pleural manometry concurrent with a thoracentesis (2); thus, patients with a trapped lung are subjected to the both the risks inherent to the thoracentesis itself; namely, discomfort, pneumothorax, and hemorrhage, and the risks of pleural drainage in the setting of a trapped lung; namely, pneumothorax ex vacuo and reexpansion pulmonary edema (3, 4).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%