1960
DOI: 10.1098/rspa.1960.0092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The absorption of light by calcium vapour (2100 to 1080 Å)

Abstract: Continuous absorption and line absorption of radiation in calcium vapour has been measured from the 4 s 4 s 1 S 0 → 4 snp 1 P 1 series limit at 2028 to 1080 Å. Two perturbed series of auto-ionization lines (4 s 4 s 1 S 0 → 3 dnp 1 P 1 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1972
1972
1983
1983

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The term system of MgI is disturbed, so the 3snd 1D series is disturbed by the 3p 2 1D term, and the function c~,, l(~) increases with n in a nonlinear form for this series, so an extrapolation is difficult and un- with Numerovs procedure including the correction of Olver [45]. Figure 14 shows the cross section for the ground state of Ca I calculated with STF, STFP and QDM and the experimental results of Hudson and Ditchburn [46]. The large differences between the various results are striking 9 For energies between 0.02 and 0.15 Ryd strong autoionization lines are dominating the experimental cross section.…”
Section: Absorption Cross Sectionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The term system of MgI is disturbed, so the 3snd 1D series is disturbed by the 3p 2 1D term, and the function c~,, l(~) increases with n in a nonlinear form for this series, so an extrapolation is difficult and un- with Numerovs procedure including the correction of Olver [45]. Figure 14 shows the cross section for the ground state of Ca I calculated with STF, STFP and QDM and the experimental results of Hudson and Ditchburn [46]. The large differences between the various results are striking 9 For energies between 0.02 and 0.15 Ryd strong autoionization lines are dominating the experimental cross section.…”
Section: Absorption Cross Sectionmentioning
confidence: 95%