“…In this essay I have argued that through the idealization of authenticity, continuity, and alignment, and their ensuing normativities, transsexuality can only be conceived as a space of loss or lack of a fullness of being that, we fantasize, is socially granted to the cisgender subject. This position fails to consider transsexuality as a potential third space, both found and created, that could open possibilities of desire and love beyond having or being (Gozlan, 2008). Transsexuality, I argue, holds the potential to shape gender as a "good enough" (Winnicott, 1971) placeholder through which sexuality ceases to be conceived as natural or predetermined but rather, and in this sense more aligned with psychoanalytic understandings, as a disorienting and disruptive force, without prefixed origin or destiny, that both exceeds and reshapes the orderings of culture.…”