2017
DOI: 10.5194/bg-14-4499-2017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The acclimative biogeochemical model of the southern North Sea

Abstract: Abstract. Ecosystem models often rely on heuristic descriptions of autotrophic growth that fail to reproduce various stationary and dynamic states of phytoplankton cellular composition observed in laboratory experiments. Here, we present the integration of an advanced phytoplankton growth model within a coupled three-dimensional physicalbiogeochemical model and the application of the model system to the southern North Sea (SNS) defined on a relatively high resolution ( ∼ 1.5-4.5 km) curvilinear grid. The autot… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
78
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 109 publications
(143 reference statements)
2
78
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4). Simulated Chl-a concentrations in this area are also lower than those estimated by the satellite imagery (e.g., Kerimoglu et al 2017;Ford et al 2017), while in the open SNS, our model modestly overestimates Chl-a and probably also NPP. NPP simulated by van Leeuwen et al (2013) with the same hydrodynamic (GETM) but with a different ecosystem model (ERSEM, Baretta et al 1995) is much higher (on average 318 ± 29 g m −2 a −1 ) than NPP simulated here for their region termed "SNS", referring to a small area of the Southern Bight of the North Sea.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…4). Simulated Chl-a concentrations in this area are also lower than those estimated by the satellite imagery (e.g., Kerimoglu et al 2017;Ford et al 2017), while in the open SNS, our model modestly overestimates Chl-a and probably also NPP. NPP simulated by van Leeuwen et al (2013) with the same hydrodynamic (GETM) but with a different ecosystem model (ERSEM, Baretta et al 1995) is much higher (on average 318 ± 29 g m −2 a −1 ) than NPP simulated here for their region termed "SNS", referring to a small area of the Southern Bight of the North Sea.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Our coupled setup differs in two respects: (i) we resolve filtration (see Sect. 2.5.1), and (ii) we used the full 3D biogeochemical model OmexDia based on Soetaert et al (1996) instead of the the single layer soil parameterization by Kerimoglu et al (2017). There, top-down mortality of zooplankton is uniform, while we prescribe higher zooplankton mortality near the coast.…”
Section: Coupled Model Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the construction of the recent (or control; C ) and historic (H ) states of the SNS, we used the coupled physical-biogeochemical model system recently introduced by Kerimoglu et al (2017). Dynamics of the pelagic biogeochemistry is described by the Model for Adaptive Ecosystems in Coastal Seas (MAECS), which, otherwise similar to other ecosystem models with respect to the recycling of the organic and inorganic macro-nutrients (carbon (C), N and P), includes an optimality based physiological acclimation model of phytoplankton growth (Wirtz & Kerimoglu, 2016).…”
Section: The Modelling Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FABM coupling allows the user to construct their own biogeochemical model using existing modules in the FABM library plus any new modules written by the user (SPBM does not itself provide any new biogeochemical modules). The FABM library is rapidly expanding and presently includes modules from some of the most detailed published biogeochemical models, e.g., The European regional seas ecosystem model (ERSEM) [21], the bottom-redox model biogeochemistry (BROM-biogeochemistry) [22], the PCLake aquatic ecosystem model [23], and the model for adaptive ecosystems in coastal seas (MAECS) [24,25]. As with FABM, SPBM transport code is written in FORTRAN.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%