1987
DOI: 10.1016/0361-3682(87)90010-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The accounting of interpretations and the interpretation of accounts: The communicative function of “the language of business”

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
51
0
6

Year Published

1997
1997
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
51
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…This argument relates to yet another body of literature that focuses on the "conceptual use" (Menon/Varadarajan, 1992, p. 56) of accounting information as a language for business communication (Otley/Berry, 1980, p. 242;Boland/Pondy, 1983, p. 228). Lavoie (1987) points out:…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This argument relates to yet another body of literature that focuses on the "conceptual use" (Menon/Varadarajan, 1992, p. 56) of accounting information as a language for business communication (Otley/Berry, 1980, p. 242;Boland/Pondy, 1983, p. 228). Lavoie (1987) points out:…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, almost any system of social accounting of which one can conceive will involve transfers of power either through the democratisation of organisations and of capital or through the capture and manipulation of social issues by organisations and by capital. Similarly, there are a wide range of concerns over such matters as the role of accounts in reifying, constructing, reinforcing and trivialising organisations and relationships both within and between those organisations, (see, for example, Hines, 1988;Francis, 1990;Lavoie, 1987;Meyer, 1986). How successfully such critiques can be levelled at this project -and perhaps undermine it -are matters dealt with only tangentially in this paper.…”
Section: Locating the Discussion: Some Initial Theoretical Reflectionsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…À qui les vérificateurs doivent-ils faire preuve de loyauté, et s'ils avaient à choisir, de qui seraient-ils enclins à rompre la confiance (Neu, 1991) ? Les règles d'objectivité comprennent un plaidoyer pour que les vérificateurs « évitent tout jugement affaibli » mais, encore une fois, ce que cela signifie et la façon pour une personne de protéger son objectivité et son jugement demeurent mystérieux, puisque l'objectivité est un acte d'interprétation (Lavoie, 1987) et que le jugement est une activité d'éthique née à la fois du corps (une émotion) et de l'esprit (Camus, 1983, p. 20 ;Roberts, 2008, p. 531). Finalement, dans les règles concernant l'aptitude, on annonce au lecteur que les vérificateurs doivent « continuellement améliorer leurs compétences et la qualité de leurs services ».…”
Section: Le Dernier Cri En Matière De Morale Dans Le Domaine De La Véunclassified