2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-629x.2010.00380.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The accrual anomaly: Australian evidence

Abstract: This paper investigates whether the accrual anomaly identified by Sloan (1996), whereby investors overestimate the impact of accruals on the persistence of earnings exists within an Australian context. While there is general support for the existence of the anomaly in Australia there are a number of idiosyncrasies in the results. First, there is evidence that in Australia investors underestimate the persistence of earnings. Second, there are greater errors in assessing the impact of cash flows on the persisten… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
44
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
8
44
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the table shows that the computed t-value equals 3.284, with a computed coefficient of significance of less than 0.05, which also refers the predictive value of current earnings in predicting future earnings. This result is in agreement with the findings of Al Jaber (2012), and Clinch et al (2010). The table also shows that the coefficient of the variable Big4 i.t is positive, and equals 1.34, but it has no significance.…”
Section: Asian Journal Of Finance and Accountingsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Moreover, the table shows that the computed t-value equals 3.284, with a computed coefficient of significance of less than 0.05, which also refers the predictive value of current earnings in predicting future earnings. This result is in agreement with the findings of Al Jaber (2012), and Clinch et al (2010). The table also shows that the coefficient of the variable Big4 i.t is positive, and equals 1.34, but it has no significance.…”
Section: Asian Journal Of Finance and Accountingsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Trading Bird and Casavecchia (2007); Fairfield and Whisenant (2000); Piotroski (2000) e Chia et al (1997) f Chia et al (1997); Clinch et al (2012); Cotter (1996); Loftus and Sin (1997); Taylor and Wong (2012) g Bird and Casavecchia (2007); Soliman (2008) h Bird and Casavecchia (2007); Piotroski (2000); Soliman (2008) i Houghton and Woodliff (1987) j Houghton and Woodliff (1987) k Donaldson (1961); Myers and Majluf (1984) l Donaldson (1961); Myers and Majluf (1984).…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature evaluates accounting metrics individually such as the asset growth effect (Bettman et al, 2011;Dou et al, 2012), profitability (Dou et al, 2012), leverage and liquidity effect (Gharghori et al, 2009). Furthermore, there are only a handful of papers that explicitly consider the relationship between earnings/accruals and stock returns (Chia et al, 1997;Clinch et al, 2012;Cotter, 1996;Hodgson and Stephenson-Clarke, 2000;Loftus and Sin, 1997;Taylor and Wong, 2012). There is a limited literature that investigates accruals quality and earnings management (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides the United States, there are only a few other countries where this anomaly has been detected, including Canada, Australia and the United Kingdom (Chan et al, 2006;Clinch, Fuller, Govendir, & Wells, 2012;LaFond, 2005;Pincus, Rajgopal, & Venkatachalam, 2007). In the Brazilian market, the evidence of accrual anomaly is not favorable to the existence of arbitrage opportunities.…”
Section: Conclusion and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%