2020
DOI: 10.1111/brv.12638
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The accuracy and precision of body mass estimation in non‐avian dinosaurs

Abstract: Inferring the body mass of fossil taxa, such as non‐avian dinosaurs, provides a powerful tool for interpreting physiological and ecological properties, as well as the ability to study these traits through deep time and within a macroevolutionary context. As a result, over the past 100 years a number of studies advanced methods for estimating mass in dinosaurs and other extinct taxa. These methods can be categorized into two major approaches: volumetric‐density (VD) and extant‐scaling (ES). The former receives … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
61
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 187 publications
1
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Body mass data were not available for most fossil taxa in our sample – especially ootaxa, i.e. fossil eggs with no associated skeletal material, for which body mass cannot be estimated (Campione and Evans 2020) – and were therefore not included in subsequent analyses. We found egg mass and body mass in modern birds (n = 57) to be highly correlated ( R 2 = 0.999, p < 0.001).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Body mass data were not available for most fossil taxa in our sample – especially ootaxa, i.e. fossil eggs with no associated skeletal material, for which body mass cannot be estimated (Campione and Evans 2020) – and were therefore not included in subsequent analyses. We found egg mass and body mass in modern birds (n = 57) to be highly correlated ( R 2 = 0.999, p < 0.001).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the larger referred femur (EMF164), our estimated femur length of this individual 2,146 mm, which would confirm the limb element size of A. cooperensis close to Dr. schrani and F. dukei , but smaller than P. mayorum . Body mass estimates for these two titanosaurians vary considerably, from a minimum estimate for F. dukei of 23,601 kg to a maximum estimate for Dr. schrani of 74,487 kg ( Campione & Evans, 2020 ). This reflects the uncertainty discussed above and thus demonstrates the issues relating to body mass estimation in extremely large tetrapods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Body mass estimation is a fraught exercise for fragmentary skeletons ( Bates et al, 2015 ; Bates et al, 2009 ; Bates et al, 2016 ; Campione & Evans, 2012 ; Campione & Evans, 2020 ; Paul, 2019 ). Recent body mass estimates of giant sauropods ( Carballido et al, 2017 ; Lacovara et al, 2014 ) using humeral and femoral circumferences ( Benson et al, 2014 ; Campione & Evans, 2012 ; Campione & Evans, 2020 ) have come under scrutiny and are shown to be implausible or inaccurate ( Bates et al, 2015 ; Otero, Carballido & Moreno, 2020 ; Paul, 2019 ). However, a recent review of these inaccuracies has suggested that the estimation methods themselves can be reconciled, albeit with reservations when dealing with particular groups of tetrapods, like giant sauropods ( Campione & Evans, 2020 ).…”
Section: Phylogenetic Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(2). As estimating body mass in extinct species is always contentious [79][80][81][82] , the first of these equations may seem more practical to estimate the actual head posture of a given extinct ungulate species. In both cases, the variance of the residuals is high, which might indicate a low predictive power of these models (R 2 equals 0.26 and 0.33, respectively).…”
Section: Lsc Orientation Is Correlated With Head Posture But Is Not mentioning
confidence: 99%