2020
DOI: 10.1186/s13030-020-00188-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The accuracy of delirium assessment by cardiologists treating heart failure inpatients: a single center retrospective survey

Abstract: Background: Patients with heart failure (HF) accompanied by delirium are at risk of rehospitalization and death, thus early detection and appropriate treatment is imperative. Palliative care for patients with HF is an important issue, particularly for patients who also have delirium. This retrospective study examined the accuracy of delirium assessment by cardiologists treating patients with HF, identified factors related to the detection of delirium, and recorded the initial treatment. Methods: This was a ret… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The high rates of referrals for delirium are in line with previous evidence that indicates an overall aging of the inpatient population in GHs and reveal a high incidence of delirium in the inpatient setting [ 35 , 36 ], a common reason for psychiatric referral [ 22 , 24 , 37 ]. The fair diagnostic accuracy found for delirium (which rose to moderate when the presentation was associated with agitation) indicates a remarkable and well-known risk that GH doctors may miss a delirium diagnosis [ 36 , 38 ], particularly in case of hypo-active delirium [ 39 ]. Further, the diagnostic concordance for delirium was lower in patients with a positive psychiatric history, suggesting that this fact may mislead the GH doctors and make them more likely to attribute symptoms of delirium to a previous psychiatric condition, preventing a proper recognition of the syndrome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high rates of referrals for delirium are in line with previous evidence that indicates an overall aging of the inpatient population in GHs and reveal a high incidence of delirium in the inpatient setting [ 35 , 36 ], a common reason for psychiatric referral [ 22 , 24 , 37 ]. The fair diagnostic accuracy found for delirium (which rose to moderate when the presentation was associated with agitation) indicates a remarkable and well-known risk that GH doctors may miss a delirium diagnosis [ 36 , 38 ], particularly in case of hypo-active delirium [ 39 ]. Further, the diagnostic concordance for delirium was lower in patients with a positive psychiatric history, suggesting that this fact may mislead the GH doctors and make them more likely to attribute symptoms of delirium to a previous psychiatric condition, preventing a proper recognition of the syndrome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22,25,26 This is most likely a result of under-recognition, underdiagnosis and underreporting of delirium which is a common pitfall. 2730 In one single center study of patients admitted to the medical intensive care unit (ICU), the prevalence of delirium on retrospective chart review was 1.7% whereas it was almost 60% on prospective evaluation using structured and validated tools such as Confusion Assessment Method–Intensive Care Unit (CAM–ICU). 29 There are several potential reasons for this under diagnosis including lack of provider knowledge, inadequate dissemination of published guidelines, and time constraints in following recommended practices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22,25,26 This is most likely a result of under-recognition, underdiagnosis and underreporting of delirium which is a common pitfall. [27][28][29][30] In one single center study of patients admitted to the Note. For all ratios, values above 1 are indicative of higher outcome values for hospitalizations that included a delirium diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM‐ICU) is recommended by the Society of Critical Care Medicine, has been extensively studied for more than 20 years and demonstrates good psychometric properties in critically ill patients when performed by researchers (Chanques et al, 2017; Devlin et al, 2018). Although the CAM‐ICU has poor accuracy when used by clinicians, when used by researchers, sensitivity and specificity were 93% and 98%, respectively (DiLibero et al, 2016; Hayashi et al, 2020).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%