The accuracy of length measurements using different intravascular ultrasound motorized transducer pullback systems

Abstract

Accurate length measurements by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) are necessary for stent length selection and for IVUS volumetric analysis. The comparative accuracy of commercially available transducer pullback systems--a necessity for accurate IVUS length and volume measurements--has never been studied. We evaluated the accuracy of four IVUS pullback systems by studying 180 patients (45 in each group) who had been treated with a single stent of known length. Stented lesions were located in the left anterior descending artery (n = 77), left circumflex artery (n = 41), right coronary artery (n = 41), left main (n = 2), and saphenous vein grafts (n = 19). The known lengths of implanted stents ranged from 8 to 33 mm. The correlations between known stent length and IVUS-measured stent length in each group were 0.92 for CVIS, 0.83 for BSC Galaxy, 0.63 for Endosonics TrackBack, and 0.69 for Volcano Model R-l00 research pullback device, respectively. Furthermore, the absolute value of the difference between the two measurements was 9.1 +/- 13.1%, 8.8 +/- 10.2%, 18.6 +/- 21.5%, and 17.5 +/- 31.4%, respectively. With the Volcano Model R-l00 research pullback device, there were 3 extreme outliers; if these three outliers were excluded, then the correlation improved from 0.69 to 0.91; and the absolute deviation from known stent length improved from 17.5 +/- 31.4% to 9.7 +/- 8.3%. Thus, there is a significant variation in length measurement accuracy among IVUS pullback devices. This should be taken into account both clinically and when planning scientific studies.

Assessment of three dimensional quantitative coronary analysis by using rotational angiography for measurement of vessel length and diameter

“…On the other hand, IVUS enables observing a coronary arterial lumen from inside the vessel, which yields a direct image that includes the luminal diameter, the lesion length and the lesion morphology of the vessel. IVUS imaging using motorized pullback of the transducer provides reliable length measurement [10, 11]. There have been several studies that have compared the findings between 2D QCA and IVUS QCA [3, 12], and there is a consensus that the severity of the disease cannot accurately be determined by 2D QCA.…”

Usefulness of Intravascular Ultrasonography Monitoring of Coil Embolization for Traumatic Direct Carotid-Cavernous Fistula -Case Report-

“…17,22) The neurovascular system is more vulnerable to embolic ischemic complications, with more tortuous and smaller vessels. 24) Moreover, the IVUS catheters are not thin or soft enough for compatibility with intracranial navigation.…”

“Does imaging paint a sugar-coated picture of diabetic vessels?”

“…Therefore, any length, and subsequently, any volume information depend on an accurate and consistent pullback of the ultrasound probe. While some studies have raised concerns about the accuracy of length measurements due to inconsistent pullback, 15 the authors demonstrated excellent correlation to known distances in the coronary bed, increasing our confidence in the volumetric measurements.…”