2020
DOI: 10.17126/joralres.2019.077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The accuracy of linear measurements in cone beam computed tomography for assessing intrabony and furcation defects: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Abstract: Objective: This study aims to assess the accuracy of the linear measurements of intrabony and/or furcation defect quantified by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Material and Methods: A systematic search of the literature was conducted by two authors independently from the PubMed, Scopus, and EBSCO for full articles published in journals between January 2003 and March 2017. Eligible studies were assessed for quality and heterogeneity using the QUADAS-2 tool. A meta-analysis was performed to identify the ac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the limitations in this present study and previous research was overestimation or underestimation of the actual alveolar bone thickness measured with CBCT versus measurements made directly with a gauge [ 34 38 39 ]. Nonetheless, CBCT is considered an accurate imaging modality with respect to linear measurements, with mean differences of less than 0.05 mm [ 40 ]. Furthermore, the error is reduced when a small FOV and medium voxel size (0.18 mm) for high resolution are selected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the limitations in this present study and previous research was overestimation or underestimation of the actual alveolar bone thickness measured with CBCT versus measurements made directly with a gauge [ 34 38 39 ]. Nonetheless, CBCT is considered an accurate imaging modality with respect to linear measurements, with mean differences of less than 0.05 mm [ 40 ]. Furthermore, the error is reduced when a small FOV and medium voxel size (0.18 mm) for high resolution are selected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many authors have documented an accuracy of CBCT images of bone analysis with less than 1 mm errors (25,26). All of the CBCT measurements were found to be non-significantly different from the direct measurements on cadaver heads, and there was no pattern of underestimation or overestimation (19).…”
Section: History Of Cbct Scan and Its Application In Implant Planningmentioning
confidence: 93%