2007
DOI: 10.1093/tropej/fmm077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Accuracy of Mother's Touch to Detect Fever in Children: A Systematic Review

Abstract: Universally, mothers often use touching to detect fever in their children. We perform a systematic review of published diagnostic studies evaluating the ability of mothers to detect fever in their children by touching. We found 10 studies satisfying our inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis revealed a summary sensitivity of 89.2% and summary specificity of 50%-maternal touch is perhaps more useful to exclude fever rather than to 'rule in' fever. However, due to significant heterogeneity in the included studies… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was found that experienced mothers were wrong in 50 per cent of the time in diagnosing low-grade fevers (38.3-38.9°C) by touch. 35 Alarmingly, in the current study, there was poor awareness about the real risk of misusing of antipyretics. When we asked the mothers about their beliefs, whether the antipyretics carry a potentially harmful effect on their children, only 32 per cent (202) of them believed in its potential harm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…It was found that experienced mothers were wrong in 50 per cent of the time in diagnosing low-grade fevers (38.3-38.9°C) by touch. 35 Alarmingly, in the current study, there was poor awareness about the real risk of misusing of antipyretics. When we asked the mothers about their beliefs, whether the antipyretics carry a potentially harmful effect on their children, only 32 per cent (202) of them believed in its potential harm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…This study involved children presenting to urban hospital settings rather than to health facilities in rural areas and this could limit the external validity of our findings as it can be difficult for healthcare workers to measure temperature in resource-poor settings. However, our definition of fever (axillary temperature ≥37.5°C or mother's report of fever) is compliant with the WHO definition3 4 and with common practice 27…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Prior studies have shown that mothers detect fevers in their children with a high sensitivity, although with a lower specificity than when a thermometer is used by a health provider. 31,32 Therefore, our definition may have overestimated the incidence of episodes. However, if the rate of overestimation was similar between the pre-vaccine and vaccine periods, then our estimated IRR would be biased towards the null, suggesting the true reduction in incidence associated with the introduction of the rotavirus vaccine may be even greater than indicated by this analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%