“…Some time ago, modulation frequencies in the range of 90 Hz and above were considered more suitable for the examination of children because the evoked EEG activity is less dependent on vigilance and maturation, compared to the responses of lower modulation frequencies [ 319 ], [ 320 ], [ 321 ], [ 322 ], [ 323 ], [ 324 ]; especially since the introduction of narrowband chirp stimuli of different stimulus rates [ 278 ], [ 325 ] this seems to be questionable in the light of recent studies [ 326 ], [ 327 ], [ 328 ], [ 329 ]. Even at low frequencies, an acceptable estimation of the hearing threshold can be achieved by means of 40 Hz ASSR in adults [ 285 ] as well as in children [ 327 ]. Since the identification of ASSR (which that may be considered as general term for those paradigms that consist of signal description and signal confirmation in the frequency range [ 330 ], [ 331 ]) is based on the modulation frequencies of the stimulus represented in the EEG, the stimulation can be performed with several differently modulated carrier frequencies and even in both ears at the same time as long as the stimulus levels exclude mutual masking [ 317 ], [ 318 ], [ 332 ], [ 333 ].…”