2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.03.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The accuracy of root canal measurements using the Mini Apex Locator and Root ZX-II: an evaluation in vitro

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
60
0
5

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
5
60
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…These studies differ in establishing the reference point from which measurement accuracy is determined. Some authors measured from the minor diameter (apical constriction) (21,22,(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33), whereas others measured from the major diameter or apical foramen (16,23,34). EALs have traditionally afforded some latitude of acceptable error in locating the apex (21,25,26,30).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These studies differ in establishing the reference point from which measurement accuracy is determined. Some authors measured from the minor diameter (apical constriction) (21,22,(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33), whereas others measured from the major diameter or apical foramen (16,23,34). EALs have traditionally afforded some latitude of acceptable error in locating the apex (21,25,26,30).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, whatever the apical limit, the measuring device used should be precise and reliable (ie, able to locate the chosen limit and giving similar readings when used by more than one operator [37]). The materials most often used are alginate (28,31,32,35,40), agar (36,43), saline solution (24,27), and gelatin (44). The validity of measurements made with in vitro models (ie, the extent to which they depict the clinical accuracy of EALs) is unknown (36).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although numerous studies indicate an increase in the accuracy concerning the determination of the WL by different EALs 5,7,[22][23][24] , the fact that prior cervical preparation of root canals performed with different instruments might affect the accuracy of these devices has not yet been proved. Thus, this study was aimed at evaluating the influence of cervical preparation, using LA-Axxess (SybronEndo) and S1 and Sx ProTaper (Dentsply Maillefer), on the accuracy of Root ZX mini and Joypex 5.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Kısa çalışma boyu kök kanalında şekillendirilmemiş ve temizlenmemiş alanların kalmasına yol açarken, taşkın preparasyon ise apikal daralım bölgesinin fazla genişletilmesine ve bunun sonucunda kök ucu çevresi dokularının zarar görmesine neden olmaktadır. 2,3 Elektronik apeks bulucu (EAB) cihazlar 40 yılı aşkın süredir kök kanalında çalışma boyunun belirlenmesinde kullanılmaktadır.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…4 EAB cihazlar minör çap bölgesini bulabilmek için kullanılır. 1 Mikroskopik çalış-malar apikal daralım bölgesinin major foramenden 0.5-1 mm mesafede yer aldığını göstermiştir. 8 Root ZX mini (J. Morita Corp., Kyoto, Japonya) daha önceden piyasada yer alan Root ZX cihazının daha küçük boyutlu ve benzer teknolojiye sahip olan bir ver-siyonudur.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified