2004
DOI: 10.3758/bf03196576
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The accuracy of spatial information from temporally and spatially organized mental maps

Abstract: The way a space is learned can result in a mental map that is either temporally or spatially organized (Curiel & Radvansky, 1998). The present study examined the availability of spatial information under map learning conditions where either temporal or spatial organization has been previously observed. The finding was that people were fairly accurate in tasks that explicitly required the use of spatial information. However, there was a particular advantage for having a spatially organized mental map in a direc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effects of spatial distance found in recognition priming tasks (McNamara, Ratcliff, & McKoon, 1984), location judgments (Clayton & Chattin, 1989;Curiel & Radvansky, 2004;McNamara, Altarriba, Bendele, Johnson, & Clayton, 1989), and Euclidean and route distance estimations (Hirtle & Hudson, 1991;Taylor, Naylor, & Chechile, 1999;Thorndyke & Hayes-Roth, 1982) provide support for spatial models of environment memory. However, Clayton and Habibi (1991) pointed out that these effects could result from temporal sequences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The effects of spatial distance found in recognition priming tasks (McNamara, Ratcliff, & McKoon, 1984), location judgments (Clayton & Chattin, 1989;Curiel & Radvansky, 2004;McNamara, Altarriba, Bendele, Johnson, & Clayton, 1989), and Euclidean and route distance estimations (Hirtle & Hudson, 1991;Taylor, Naylor, & Chechile, 1999;Thorndyke & Hayes-Roth, 1982) provide support for spatial models of environment memory. However, Clayton and Habibi (1991) pointed out that these effects could result from temporal sequences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The naming task led to temporal priming while the pointing task led to spatial priming (Curiel & Radvansky, 1998). The pointing task also boosted fine-grained spatial knowledge as evidenced on a direction judgment task (Curiel & Radvansky, 2004). These results suggest that our reasons for learning an environment influence how we represent it in memory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 3 more Smart Citations