2014
DOI: 10.1210/jc.2013-2928
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Accuracy of Thyroid Nodule Ultrasound to Predict Thyroid Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract: Low- to moderate-quality evidence suggests that individual ultrasound features are not accurate predictors of thyroid cancer. Two features, cystic content and spongiform appearance, however, might predict benign nodules, but this has limited applicability to clinical practice due to their infrequent occurrence.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
300
9
17

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 415 publications
(342 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
16
300
9
17
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, there was no statistically significant difference between malignant and benign nodules size. These contradictory results show that the size of the nodule is not reliable at predicting malignancy and should not be applied for medical decision making (12,13,(22)(23)(24).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, there was no statistically significant difference between malignant and benign nodules size. These contradictory results show that the size of the nodule is not reliable at predicting malignancy and should not be applied for medical decision making (12,13,(22)(23)(24).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,6 More than 30 studies in the last year alone have examined the utility of thyroid nodule ultrasonography to predict malignancy based on different features. 4,[7][8][9][10] In a recent meta-analysis, Brito and colleagues 11 documented substantial heterogeneity across studies; the typical reporting schemes for thyroid ultrasounds are unclear, as is the practical utility of using ultrasounds to perform risk stratification of thyroid nodules. 11 The Thyroid Imaging and Reporting System (TI-RADS) was developed to provide a minimum common data set for standardized risk stratification of thyroid nodules.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,[7][8][9][10] In a recent meta-analysis, Brito and colleagues 11 documented substantial heterogeneity across studies; the typical reporting schemes for thyroid ultrasounds are unclear, as is the practical utility of using ultrasounds to perform risk stratification of thyroid nodules. 11 The Thyroid Imaging and Reporting System (TI-RADS) was developed to provide a minimum common data set for standardized risk stratification of thyroid nodules. 7,[12][13][14][15] For a thyroid ultrasound report to conform to TI-RADS it must include the following nodule characteristics: marked hypoechogenicity, taller-than-wide shape, microcalcifications, irregular margins and solid component in addition to size.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ayrıca yapılan çalışmalarda birçok özelliğin tiroid kanseri ile ilişkili olduğu bildirilmektedir ve çoğunluğu papiller tiroid kanseri (PTK)'dir. Bunlar, mikrokalsifikasyonlar, çevredeki tiroid veya strep kasları ile karşılaştırıldığında nodül hipoekojenitesi, düzensiz kenarlar (infiltratif, mikrolobule ve spiküle) ve transvers bir görünüm üzerinde ölçülen nodül boyunun eninden uzun olması olarak sayılabilir (KD 2) [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16].İntranodüler Tiroid nodüllerinde güncel yaklaşım S a y f a | 20 vaskülarite özellikle folliküler tiroid kanserleriyle (FTK) ilişkili olarak saptanmıştır [12,17]. FTK, PTK'ye kıyasla sonografik özelliklerde bazı farklılıklar gösterir.…”
Section: Tiroid Nodüllerinde Ultrasonografiunclassified