2014
DOI: 10.5606/ehc.2014.17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The accuracy of two different extra-medullary tibial cutting guides for posterior tibial slope in total knee arthroplasty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be compensated by insert design. In a study perfomed by Bek et al the influence of two different extramedullary tibial cutting guides on the posterior tibial slope was compared revealing that convenient with our results the slope angle was decreased in both groups with respect to the preoperative values 19 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…It can be compensated by insert design. In a study perfomed by Bek et al the influence of two different extramedullary tibial cutting guides on the posterior tibial slope was compared revealing that convenient with our results the slope angle was decreased in both groups with respect to the preoperative values 19 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The difference caused by soft tissues was found to be 0.16±2.05 mm, and this did not adversely affect the alignment. However, our suggestion is that the point 3–5 mm medial to the malleolar center is a more precise reference point, as advocated by many authors 10,12,17–19…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The technique using the bi-malleolar center has been reported as another significant reference point. The point located 3–5 mm medial to the malleolar center has been suggested for use as the center of the ankle 10,12,17–19. Its disadvantage is difficulty in palpation, which sometimes occurs during surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the coronal plane, the tibial bone resection needs to be perpendicular to the tibial mechanical axis. In addition to navigation and patient-speci c instrumentation, the traditional method of aligning the tibial mechanical axis is to use the proximal spike of the cutting guide to anchor the ACL attachment to the tibia [26], the anterior middle third of the anterior and posterior axis of the tibial plateau [27], and the intercondylar eminentia [28], as well as the point on the tibia plateau, resulting in the extramedullary rod being parallel to the palpable bula [27]. In the distal tibia, because the ankle joint center is di cult to locate, the second metatarsal [29], rst and second metatarsal spaces [30], tibialis anterior tendon, or anterior tibial crest [31,32] are often used as markers, and through these, generally good coronal alignment can be obtained.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%