2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11999-012-2477-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Acetabular Wall Index for Assessing Anteroposterior Femoral Head Coverage in Symptomatic Patients

Abstract: Background Understanding acetabular pathomorphology is necessary to correctly treat patients with hip complaints. Existing radiographic parameters classify acetabular coverage as deficient, normal, or excessive but fail to quantify contributions of anterior and posterior wall coverage. A simple, reproducible, and valid measurement of anterior and posterior wall coverage in patients with hip pain would be a clinically useful tool. Questions/Purposes We (1) introduce the anterior wall index (AWI) and posterior w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
141
2
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(152 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
8
141
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The following radiographic parameters are measured: Tönnis grade osteoarthritis [35], lateral center edge angle (LCE) of Wiberg [36], the Acetabular Index [37][38][39], crossover sign, posterior wall sign [40], and ischial spine sign [41]. To assess the anterior and posterior femoral head coverage the acetabular wall index is calculated [42]. As a sign of subluxation of the head the Shenton line [43] is measured.…”
Section: Radiological Examinationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following radiographic parameters are measured: Tönnis grade osteoarthritis [35], lateral center edge angle (LCE) of Wiberg [36], the Acetabular Index [37][38][39], crossover sign, posterior wall sign [40], and ischial spine sign [41]. To assess the anterior and posterior femoral head coverage the acetabular wall index is calculated [42]. As a sign of subluxation of the head the Shenton line [43] is measured.…”
Section: Radiological Examinationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this costconscious era, the ability to use plain film radiographs to assess acetabular morphology is warranted. It may be challenging to properly diagnose those hip pathomorphologies associated with anterior and posterior coverage with plain film radiography [10,14,15]. To better evaluate anterior and posterior coverage, Siebenrock et al [15] developed measurements on plain films that take into consideration femoral head size and relative anterior and posterior walls to better quantify wall coverage relative to the femoral head diameter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the relative coverage contributed by each wall (anterior wall index [AWI] and posterior wall index [PWI]) can then be used to assess overall acetabular coverage as well as acetabular morphology and orientation. However, Siebenrock et al [15] only examined a small number of symptomatic patients with apparent pathomorphologies who had undergone either periacetabular osteotomy or surgical hip dislocation with or without rim trimming. More recently, Tannast et al [16] provided reference values for acetabular coverage using well-established measurements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors evaluated anterior and posterior femoral head coverage in ''normal'' hips using the anterior wall index (AWI) and posterior wall index (PWI) [10].…”
Section: T He Cross-sectional Study Byunclassified
“…Siebenrock and colleagues [10] introduced the concept of AWI and PWI as a measurement on plain films to quantify the contribution of anterior and posterior wall coverage in acetabular pathomorphology of symptomatic patients. Numerous radiographic angles, indices, and ratios-including the lateral center-edge angle, ACM angle, sharp angle, acetabular and extrusion indices, cranio-caudal acetabular coverage, AP acetabular coverage, and crossover and posterior wall sign-also describe the acetabular anatomic morphology projected on the AP pelvic radiograph [11].…”
Section: T He Cross-sectional Study Bymentioning
confidence: 99%