2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.scijus.2012.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The acid phosphatase test two minute cut-off: An insufficient time to detect some semen stains

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The forensic science community has historically relied on the AP reaction as the best indicator for the presence of sperm. Following a literature search, Lewis reported no scientific basis for the two‐minute AP cutoff time, and additionally, both Lewis and Redhead demonstrated that increasing this cutoff time up to 16 min may be required in certain scenarios. Hofft states that the AP test does not provide reliable information as to the presence of seminal fluid and it is very tenuously related to the number of sperm heads.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The forensic science community has historically relied on the AP reaction as the best indicator for the presence of sperm. Following a literature search, Lewis reported no scientific basis for the two‐minute AP cutoff time, and additionally, both Lewis and Redhead demonstrated that increasing this cutoff time up to 16 min may be required in certain scenarios. Hofft states that the AP test does not provide reliable information as to the presence of seminal fluid and it is very tenuously related to the number of sperm heads.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of the AP Spot Test on semen dilutions suggest that samples that contain low amounts of AP can take more time to show a positive reaction, and it could possibly take longer than two minutes. Other literature researchers show the same conclusion, indicating that the two minutes estimated to avoid false-positive results have no scientific basis [7,8]. Therefore samples which take more than two minutes to react should not be considered false-positive and promptly discarded as evidence, since there may be seen in low concentrations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…However, as the method is currently implemented by operational forensic science laboratories allows 2 min for a reaction to be obtained beyond which a negative result is declared (Skalleberg and Bouzga 2016). Furthermore, recent research has shown that using the AP standard presumptive test semen could be detected in excess of 15 min depending on the dilutions using the press and test method (Lewis et al 2012;Redhead and Brown 2013). The proposed substitute method falls within the timeframe that is indicated by standard operational forensic science laboratories.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%