This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfihn master. UMI fihns the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer.The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction.In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion.Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book.Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6" x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order.
UMI
STATEMENT BY AUTHORThis dissertation has been submitted in partial fulfillment of requirements for an advanced degree at The University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library.Brief quotations from this dissertation are allowable without special permission, provided that accurate acknowledgment of source is made. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major department or the Dean of the Graduate College when in his or her judgment the proposed use of the material is in the interests of scholarship. In all other instances, however, permission must be obtained from the author. The results of the present study indicate that an increase in loudness as associated by an increase in noise bandwidth affects the contralateral suppression of TEOAEs. Only the WB noise was associated with a reduction of TEOAE amplitudes. It is believed that this effect results because the WB noise has greater effective energy representation across frequency on the basilar membrane. Although the spectrum level of the WB noise is lower than that of the NB noise at the transducer, it receives more gain from the action of the cochlear amplifier than the NB noise and thus has greater energy representation on the cochlear partition. While the effective energy level on the basilar membrane may have been essentially the same for the WB and EQ noises as a result of the action of the cochlear amplifier, the WB noise was the more effective suppressor because its energy was summed across multiple critical bands. The energy in the EQ noise was confined to a sing...