2022
DOI: 10.1121/10.0012221
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The acoustical effect of the neck frill of the frill-necked lizard (Chlamydosaurus kingii)

Abstract: Animals localise sound by making use of acoustical cues resulting from space and frequency dependent filtering of sound by the head and body. Sound arrives at each ear at different times, with different intensities, and with varying spectral content, all of which are affected by the animal's head and the relative sound source position. Location cues in mammals benefit from structures (pinnae) that modify these cues and provide information that helps resolve the cone of confusion and provide cues to sound sourc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our HRTF results suggest prairie voles have ITD sensitivity consistent with their head and pinna sizes (∼± 80 μ s, calculated as pinna width plus inter pinna distance divided by the speed of sound, 343 m/s). The general slope and range of cues match well with the expected ranges based on their head features and are consistent with similar measurements in other species (human, 34,53,54 cat, 55–57 monkey, 58,59 ferret, 60,61 tammar wallaby, 62 various species of bats, 63–66 gerbil, 41 chinchilla, 67,68 mouse, 69,70 rat, 71,72 rabbit, 73 barn owl, 74,75 guinea pig, 33 and frilled neck lizard, 35 among others). Unsurprisingly, as pinna and head size were similar between the sexes, HRTF measurements did not show clear differences between the sexes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Our HRTF results suggest prairie voles have ITD sensitivity consistent with their head and pinna sizes (∼± 80 μ s, calculated as pinna width plus inter pinna distance divided by the speed of sound, 343 m/s). The general slope and range of cues match well with the expected ranges based on their head features and are consistent with similar measurements in other species (human, 34,53,54 cat, 55–57 monkey, 58,59 ferret, 60,61 tammar wallaby, 62 various species of bats, 63–66 gerbil, 41 chinchilla, 67,68 mouse, 69,70 rat, 71,72 rabbit, 73 barn owl, 74,75 guinea pig, 33 and frilled neck lizard, 35 among others). Unsurprisingly, as pinna and head size were similar between the sexes, HRTF measurements did not show clear differences between the sexes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%