2021
DOI: 10.1080/01972243.2020.1870022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The acquisition of health and science information in the 21st century

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
37
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…New groups and organizations of information brokers are being formed to collect, filter, spin, and redistribute information—often reflecting particular ideologies or theologies. The market for information is now largely decentralized and we are just beginning to understand the implications of this change for democratic government (Prior, 2007) and for the public acceptance of science (Miller et al, 2021).…”
Section: The New World Of Information Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…New groups and organizations of information brokers are being formed to collect, filter, spin, and redistribute information—often reflecting particular ideologies or theologies. The market for information is now largely decentralized and we are just beginning to understand the implications of this change for democratic government (Prior, 2007) and for the public acceptance of science (Miller et al, 2021).…”
Section: The New World Of Information Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This change encompasses all areas of information in modern societies, but it is especially relevant to the public understanding of health and science. Some scholars predicted the emergence of a just-in-time system on the eve of the Internet era (Peters, 1993), and the experience of high-speed electronic communication at work and at home in recent decades has profoundly changed the way that humans acquire information today (Miller et al, 2021). The driving force in any just-in-time system is salience.…”
Section: The Implications Of Just-in-time Information Acquisition On ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And in the context of this person's everyday life and plans, there are many smaller (e.g., checking the bus schedule) and larger (e.g., researching potential employers or graduate programs) information needs readily and effectively satisfied through digital media. Beyond merely retrieving "ready-made" information as in the case of the visa requirements, many information seeking tasks are more complex, aiming at knowledge building by continuously integrating new information (e.g., health or science, Miller et al, 2021). Often and increasingly, people in digital societies first turn to digital media whenever they need to find specific information or read up on a topic in everyday life -in countries such as Switzerland, the internet is now on par with interpersonal contacts in terms of importance as an information source (Latzer et al, 2021c).…”
Section: Digital Information Seeking Well-being and Governancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…An increasingly important-and changing-measure concerns adult science information acquisition. The traditional broadcast model of information dissemination is being replaced by a just-intime information acquisition system that takes advantage of the Internet and related digital communication technologies (Case and Given, 2016;Miller, 2010bMiller, , 2010cMiller et al, 2021). Because of the changes in information technologies over the 30 years, our measures have varied to reflect the dominant technologies and practices of the time.…”
Section: The Factors Predicting Acceptance or Rejection Of Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior research indicates that higher levels of educational attainment and participation in college science courses provides a set of cognitive tools that enable individuals to more effectively seek science information in the Internet era (Miller, 2010b(Miller, , 2010cMiller et al, 2021;van Dijk, 2020). The 2019 model is consistent with this view: individuals who report a higher level of overt information-seeking on the Internet and related digital platforms were slightly more likely to accept evolution than individuals who did not engage in this kind of science information-seeking (total effect = 0.07), holding constant the preceding demographic and educational variables.…”
Section: A Model To Predict the Acceptance Of Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%