2003
DOI: 10.1075/hsm.1.05hin
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The acquisition of subjects in bilingual children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result does not support the cross-linguistic hypothesis of Müller and Hulk, which would favor the incorrect use of overt subject instead of null subject in the pro-drop language (Turkish) by the influence of the non-pro-drop language being simultaneously acquired. The result is compatible with the studies of Zwanziger et al (2005) and Hinzelin (2003). This lack of quantitative difference can be accounted for by the hypothesis of Sorrace (2005), who claimed that quantitative differences in the data collected may stem from few opportunities to interpret and produce correct subject realizations.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This result does not support the cross-linguistic hypothesis of Müller and Hulk, which would favor the incorrect use of overt subject instead of null subject in the pro-drop language (Turkish) by the influence of the non-pro-drop language being simultaneously acquired. The result is compatible with the studies of Zwanziger et al (2005) and Hinzelin (2003). This lack of quantitative difference can be accounted for by the hypothesis of Sorrace (2005), who claimed that quantitative differences in the data collected may stem from few opportunities to interpret and produce correct subject realizations.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Hence, one of the reasons why this study did not favor Hulk and Müller's hypothesis may be the age of the bilingual participant of the present study. She was 5 years old, but the crosslinguistic influence of a non-pro-drop language on pro-drop languages in previous studies turned out to be found with participants aged 2;10, 3;09, 3;04 by Hinzelin (2003), Zwanziger et. al.…”
Section: Age Factormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4 Marta's data show an initially high production of null subjects 3. Contrary to these studies, Hinzelin (2003), Juan-Garau & Pérez-Vidal (2000) and Liceras et al (2012aLiceras et al ( , 2012b report that young bilinguals do not seem to necessarily exhibit difficulty in "setting the null subject parameter to its respective value in each of their two languages" (Hinzelin 2003: 19).…”
Section: Early Acquisition Of Null and Overt Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 94%