1941
DOI: 10.1093/infdis/69.2.148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Actinomyces of the Human Mouth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1944
1944
1982
1982

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous attempts to demonstrate pathogenicity of Actinomyces in various experimental animals have not been uniformly successful (Emmons, 1935;Bibby and Knighton, 1941;Slack, 1942;Hazen, Little and Resnick, 1952;Howell et af., 1959). Rosebury, Epps and Clark (1944) provided an extensive review of the early literature on experimental actinomycosis in laboratory animals and concluded that certain essential factors in the pathogenicity of the disease had not been defined.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous attempts to demonstrate pathogenicity of Actinomyces in various experimental animals have not been uniformly successful (Emmons, 1935;Bibby and Knighton, 1941;Slack, 1942;Hazen, Little and Resnick, 1952;Howell et af., 1959). Rosebury, Epps and Clark (1944) provided an extensive review of the early literature on experimental actinomycosis in laboratory animals and concluded that certain essential factors in the pathogenicity of the disease had not been defined.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Nocardia form part of the ill-defined 'aerobic Actinomyces', and many workers, notably Naselund (1925), Lord & Trevett (1936), Cope (1938), Bibby & Knighton (1941), Crowley (1941), and Bartels (1943), claim that they differ from the Actinomyces proper only by their ability to tolerate oxygen.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various media have been used in the past for the isolation ofActinomyces from the mouth and from actinomycotic lesions (3,10,13,21,22). The media used in these studies were not selective in relation to the bulk of the competing flora; thus, the isolation and identification of Actinomyces, particularly from the complex oral flora, could be a laborious and time-consuming process.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%