1950
DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1950.tb00584.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Action of Acetylcholine on the Rabbit Auricle*

Abstract: The problem of the exact site and mechanism of action of acetylcholine on cardiac muscle is a difficult one. It is probable that it will eventually be solved, not by one experiment, but by the gradual accumulation of accurate quantitative evidence and a consideration of this information against a physico-chemical background. It is doubtful whether there is as yet sufficient accurate information to solve this problem basically. The present investigation was an attempt to obtain such evidence as may be useful in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

1953
1953
1985
1985

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When this concentration was applied in the presence of eserine 10-6 g./ml., the contractions were arrested. This effect of eserine was described by Webb (1950). The contractions were resumed when the bath fluid was changed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…When this concentration was applied in the presence of eserine 10-6 g./ml., the contractions were arrested. This effect of eserine was described by Webb (1950). The contractions were resumed when the bath fluid was changed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The selectivity observed with acetylcholine is probably attributable to the action ofAChE, since such selectivity was abolished in the presence of physostigmine. Webb (1950) found high concentrations of AChE in mycardial nodal tissue. The 40-60 fold difference in affinity of a bridged analogue of arecoline reported by Mutschler & Lambrecht (1984) may also be attributable to the action of AChE.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Although, except for carbachol, there was reasonable agreement with respect to order of potency, all the compounds were more potent relative to acetylcholine in depressing ventricular rate than atrial force. The difference may reflect the type and/or distribution of cardiac cholinesterase enzymes which control the quantitative response of the myocardium to acetylcholine (Webb, 1950). If, as is suggested, there is a greater concentration of cholinesterase activity in the region of the pacemaker than in contractile muscle cells (Webb, 1950;Roberts & Konjovic, 1969), then not only would a larger concentration of acetylcholine be needed to inhibit rate than force, but also differences in relative potencies would be expected between acetylcholine and those compounds not hydrolyzed by cholinesterases.…”
Section: Drugs Usedmentioning
confidence: 99%