1956
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1956.sp005544
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The action of adrenaline, noradrenaline, acetylcholine and histamine on the perfused liver of the monkey, cat and rabbit

Abstract: In an earlier paper (Andrews, Hecker, Maegraith & Ritchie, 1955) we described the actions of adrenaline, noradrenaline, acetylcholine and histamine on the perfused canine liver. In this paper we record briefly a study of the action of the same substances on the livers of the monkey, cat and rabbit. The work has been carried out in order to assess differences in the reactions of the hepatic vessels of these mammals. We were especially interested in the part played by the hepatic veins in the control of liver bl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

2
6
1
1

Year Published

1960
1960
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
6
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the cat, histamine had little effect on hepatic volume even when massive doses were infused into the hepatic artery. This confirms previous studies on the isolated perfused cat liver (Andrews, Hecker & Maegraith, 1956;Bauer et al, 1932). The hepatic venous bed in the cat either lacks the specific smooth muscle which is involved in the dog or the venous smooth muscle has no histamine receptors.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In the cat, histamine had little effect on hepatic volume even when massive doses were infused into the hepatic artery. This confirms previous studies on the isolated perfused cat liver (Andrews, Hecker & Maegraith, 1956;Bauer et al, 1932). The hepatic venous bed in the cat either lacks the specific smooth muscle which is involved in the dog or the venous smooth muscle has no histamine receptors.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Interestingly, catecholamine infusions caused no or only slight effects on the portal venous resistance in physiologically intact (innervated) animals 42, 48, 49. By contrast, in models investigating injured livers, such as isolated liver preparations, Epi and NorEpi consistently increased portal venous resistance and subsequently reduced PVF 44. Accordingly, in our current study, we did not detect a significant decrease of THF or microcirculation during systemic infusion of both catecholamines in native and denervated livers.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 80%
“…Studies have been performed on isolated preparations as well as in intact animals and man with differing results. In the isolated perfused liver, both adrenaline and noradrenaline cause reduction in flow (Bauer, Dale, Poulson & Richards, 1932;Chakravarti & Tripod, 1940;Daniel & Prichard, 1951;Andrews, Hecker, Maegraith & Ritchie, 1955;Andrews Hecker & Maegraith, 1956). This response is blocked by ergotoxine (Bauer et al, 1932), azapetine, and phenoxybenzamine (Green, Hall, Sexton & Deal, 1959).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%