2001
DOI: 10.1046/j.1432-1327.2001.02413.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The action of starch synthase II on 6′′′‐α‐maltotriosyl‐maltohexaose comprising the branch point of amylopectin

Abstract: The principle of using a chemically synthesized, welldefined branched oligosaccharide to provide a more detailed knowledge of the substrate specificity of starch synthase II (SSII) is demonstrated. The branched nonasaccharide, 6000 -a-maltotriosyl-maltohexaose, was investigated as a primer for particulate SSII using starch granules prepared from the low-amylose pea mutant lam as the enzyme source. The starch granule preparation from the lam pea mutant contains no starch synthases other than SSII and is devoid … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
10
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
3
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All of the added putative primers were found to inhibit starch synthesis; the inhibition increased, as the concentrations of the putative primers were increased (see, Figure 1 for the inhibition of maize starch by maltose and maltotriose), contrary to what would be expected for the synthesis of starch by the addition of glucose to primers. The putative primers did undergo a reaction to primarily form the next higher homologue, similar to what previously had been observed by Damager et al (2001).…”
Section: G-p G-g-g-g- +supporting
confidence: 78%
“…All of the added putative primers were found to inhibit starch synthesis; the inhibition increased, as the concentrations of the putative primers were increased (see, Figure 1 for the inhibition of maize starch by maltose and maltotriose), contrary to what would be expected for the synthesis of starch by the addition of glucose to primers. The putative primers did undergo a reaction to primarily form the next higher homologue, similar to what previously had been observed by Damager et al (2001).…”
Section: G-p G-g-g-g- +supporting
confidence: 78%
“…It is generally known that plant SS isozymes exhibit high activities toward various branched glucans including amylopectin and glycogen while the activities for linear MOS and amylose are very low Damager et al 2001;Imparl-Radosevich et al 2003;Senoura et al 2007;Nakamura et al 2014). It is also well known that SSI and SSII are markedly activated by high concentrations ( 0.3 M) of citrate (Ozbun et al 1971b;Hawker et al 1974;Boyer and Preiss 1979;Pollock and Preiss 1980;Senoura et al 2007;Nakamura et al 2014) (for other properties of SS, see review by Fujita and Nakamura 2012).…”
Section: Multiple Ss Isozymesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much later, Damager et al 16, studied the reaction of a low‐amylose, pea mutant lam starch granules, containing granule bound SSII with maltotriose and maltohexaose and a branched nine‐carbon maltodextrin, 6 III ‐α‐maltotriosyl maltohexaose, as putative primers. They found that the maltodextrins did not give the synthesis of starch chains by reaction with starch‐synthase and only added one or two glucose units to the nonreducing‐ends of the maltodextrins, and only one glucose unit was added to each of the two nonreducing‐ends of the branched, 6 III ‐α‐maltotriosyl maltohexaose, which was not further elongated to give starch synthesis.…”
Section: Historical Background From 1940 To 1966mentioning
confidence: 99%