1966
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3697(66)90077-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The activation energy for self-diffusion in the Cu3Au alloy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1971
1971
1994
1994

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For Cu 3 Au, Eord (d-.o) = 1.6eV (Hashimoto et al, 1976) while E for DAu in d-Cu 3 Au is 1.65eV (Benci et al, , 1966; E for DAu in ordered Cu 3 Au was estimated by Benci and Gasperrini (1966) to be ~2eV. These various comparisons suggest that in cold-worked Ni 3 AI (but not in the other alloys) there is a considerable excess of vacancies above equilibrium, at least during the early stages of ordering.…”
Section: Correlation Of Ordering Kinetics and Diffusivitiesmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For Cu 3 Au, Eord (d-.o) = 1.6eV (Hashimoto et al, 1976) while E for DAu in d-Cu 3 Au is 1.65eV (Benci et al, , 1966; E for DAu in ordered Cu 3 Au was estimated by Benci and Gasperrini (1966) to be ~2eV. These various comparisons suggest that in cold-worked Ni 3 AI (but not in the other alloys) there is a considerable excess of vacancies above equilibrium, at least during the early stages of ordering.…”
Section: Correlation Of Ordering Kinetics and Diffusivitiesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Spot values for d-Ni 3 Fe at 1200 'C, including DFe: Kohn et al, 1970. DAu in d-Cu 3 Au: Benci and Gasperrini, 1966.…”
Section: Input Datamentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The energy barriers for exchanges between gold or copper atoms with a copper vacancy and of a copper atom with a gold vacancy are displayed in figure 5 and lead to migration energies that equal 0.76 eV, 0.66 eV, and 0.61 eV, respectively. The comparison with experimental determinations in the ordered phase from electrical resistivity measurements, 0.9 eV [32], 0.97 eV [33], and 1.07 eV [34], shows the model to significantly underestimate this quantity. The discrepancy persists for the dynamical determination of the migration energy yielding the value, Em = 0.52 eV, in the temperature range 1,000-1,170 K. Despite the above, qualitative features associated with the vacancy diffusion are compatible with experiments indicating that the vacancy spends ~ 82% of its lifetime on the copper sublattice whereas from our calculations the value, 90%, is deduced.…”
Section: Vacancy Formation and Migrationmentioning
confidence: 99%