1978
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/183.4.549
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The active elliptical galaxy NGC 1052

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
85
2

Year Published

1979
1979
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
85
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In this paper we focus on the radio properties of the ∼200 LLAGNs and AGNs (median distance ∼17 Mpc) in the Palomar spectroscopic sample of ∼488 bright northern galaxies (Ho et al 1997a). The weak emissionlines of the Palomar LLAGNs can be modeled in terms of photoionization by hot, young stars (Terlevich & Melnick 1985;Filippenko & Terlevich 1992;Shields 1992), by collisional ionization in shocks (Koski & Osterbrock 1976;Fosbury et al 1978;Heckman 1980;Dopita & Sutherland 1995) or by starbursts (Alonso-Herrero et al 1999). Alternatively, they could trace AGNs accreting either at very low accretion rates (with radiated luminosity as low as ∼10 −2 −10 −7 of the Eddington Luminosity, L Eddington ), or at radiative efficiencies (the ratio of radiated energy to accreted mass) much lower than the typical value of ∼10% (e.g.…”
Section: Accretion Activity: Ubiquity and Scalingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper we focus on the radio properties of the ∼200 LLAGNs and AGNs (median distance ∼17 Mpc) in the Palomar spectroscopic sample of ∼488 bright northern galaxies (Ho et al 1997a). The weak emissionlines of the Palomar LLAGNs can be modeled in terms of photoionization by hot, young stars (Terlevich & Melnick 1985;Filippenko & Terlevich 1992;Shields 1992), by collisional ionization in shocks (Koski & Osterbrock 1976;Fosbury et al 1978;Heckman 1980;Dopita & Sutherland 1995) or by starbursts (Alonso-Herrero et al 1999). Alternatively, they could trace AGNs accreting either at very low accretion rates (with radiated luminosity as low as ∼10 −2 −10 −7 of the Eddington Luminosity, L Eddington ), or at radiative efficiencies (the ratio of radiated energy to accreted mass) much lower than the typical value of ∼10% (e.g.…”
Section: Accretion Activity: Ubiquity and Scalingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shock heating was initially proposed as a viable excitation mechanism to solve the so-called "temperature problem" of Seyferts and LINERs, in which the electron temperatures observed were found to be systematically higher than predicted by photoionization models. Koski & Osterbrock (1976) and Fosbury et al (1978) argued that shocks are essential for explaining the observed [OIII] line ratios of the prototypical LINER NGC 1052. Dopita & Sutherland (1995) and Allen et al (2008) presented extensive grids of high velocity shock models, and showed that the emission line ratios observed in LINERs can be modeled in terms of fast shocks (150-500 km s −1 ) in a relatively gas poor environment.…”
Section: Comparison With Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…low-luminosity Seyferts, LINERs, and "transition" nuclei [nuclei with spectra intermediate between those of LINERs and H II regions]) is a continuing one. Their low emission-line luminosities (L Hα ≤ 10 40 erg s −1 by definition, Ho et al 1997a, hereafter H97a) can be modeled in terms of photoionization by hot, young stars (Terlevich & Melnick 1985;Filippenko & Terlevich 1992;Shields 1992), by collisional ionization in shocks (Koski & Osterbrock 1976;Fosbury et al 1978;Heckman 1980;Dopita & Sutherland 1995) or by aging starbursts (Alonso-Herrero et al 1999). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%