The Changing Face of welfareConsequences and Outcomes From a Citizenship Perspective 2005
DOI: 10.1332/policypress/9781861345929.003.0008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The active society and activation policy: ideologies, contexts and effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
18
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Kvist 2001). The results of the analysis presented in this paper are more in line with interpretations arguing that the practised activation measures may further marginalise the 'activated' (Gallie 2004;Elm Larsen 2005;Holmqvist 2010;Blasco and Rosholm 2011). Correspondingly, the measures have been criticised for (a) tending to concentrate on 'activation' operations instead of helping the unemployed find work (Haikkola 2015), (b) perceiving the main problem to be the benefit claimants themselves rather than their unemployment, (c) being unable to tackle insider-outsider divisions, and (d) embodying a generally neoliberal agenda (Clarke 2005;Bambra and Smith 2010;Caswell et al 2010;Kananen 2012).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Kvist 2001). The results of the analysis presented in this paper are more in line with interpretations arguing that the practised activation measures may further marginalise the 'activated' (Gallie 2004;Elm Larsen 2005;Holmqvist 2010;Blasco and Rosholm 2011). Correspondingly, the measures have been criticised for (a) tending to concentrate on 'activation' operations instead of helping the unemployed find work (Haikkola 2015), (b) perceiving the main problem to be the benefit claimants themselves rather than their unemployment, (c) being unable to tackle insider-outsider divisions, and (d) embodying a generally neoliberal agenda (Clarke 2005;Bambra and Smith 2010;Caswell et al 2010;Kananen 2012).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Unemployment benefits have always been conditional on unemployment being involuntary, with an expectation of active job search. It is the increasingly sharp policy focus on individual behaviour that is new (Larsen, 2001). The introduction of JSA in October 1996 was an important landmark that represented a fundamental change in the rights and responsibilities of the unemployed (Finn, 1996).…”
Section: Workfare In the New Millenniummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the framework of social activation, labour activation is propagated as a key measure to preserve and develop human resources, open outlets for individual activity and secure routes for framing equal social status and full participation in society (Larsen ; Thoren ). Whether labour‐activation schemes achieve their aims remains a highly contested issue: many question their meaningfulness and effectiveness (see Holmqvist ; Ronsen ; van Hal et al .…”
Section: Exploring Labour Activationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grounding the research among post-Soviet-immigrant newcomers in Germany, and focusing on cases of those who, having failed to secure sustained employment, found themselves the targets of, or got involved voluntarily in, projects offered in the framework of labour-activation policies, this article asks whether the promise of empowerment through responsibilisation and activation turned, for those involved, into more than just a promise. and secure routes for framing equal social status and full participation in society (Larsen 2005;Thoren 2008). Whether labour-activation schemes achieve their aims remains a highly contested issue: many question their meaningfulness and effectiveness (see Holmqvist 2009;Ronsen 2009; van Hal et al 2012;van Oorschot and Abrahamson 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%