1940
DOI: 10.1128/jb.40.5.733-745.1940
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Activity of Chemotherapeutic Agents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1942
1942
1956
1956

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to the above studies Libby (1940) reported that using large inocula (12 to 50 million organisms), in every instance where a drug has shown activity at the four-hour incubation period it has been possible to demonstrate activity at the two-hour incubation period. In all our experiments the initial inoculum has been over a billion organisms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…In contrast to the above studies Libby (1940) reported that using large inocula (12 to 50 million organisms), in every instance where a drug has shown activity at the four-hour incubation period it has been possible to demonstrate activity at the two-hour incubation period. In all our experiments the initial inoculum has been over a billion organisms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…There are, however, a few contrary reports. Libby (1940) used an actively growing culture of a pneumococcus as an inoculum and obtained no delay in the SA action. Muir et al (1942) obtained a delay in the sulfonamide inhibition when using a 24-hour culture of Salmonella enteritidis as an inoculum.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Turbidity readings. Many investigators (Libby, 1940;Kohn and Harris, 1941; MacLeod and Mirich, 1942) have used this method for measuring bacterial growth. Hershey (1939) found that density readings are an accurate method for the determination of growth since nitrogen determinations were proportional to the turbidity readings.…”
Section: Downloaded Frommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study is concerned with comparing results using the special apparatus described with those obtained with the Klett-Summerson colorimeter, and is not an attempt to establish the value of the turbidimetric method. The latter is something which must be determined by the experimenter for his every individual problem, because results published by various workers comparing the turbidimetric method with other methods such as the plate count have varied considerably (Kohn and Harris, 1941;Libby, 1940). In any particular problem it is mandatory that the method used in determining cell populations give sufficiently accurate results for the interpretations which are to be based upon them.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%