Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Intranasal administration of enviroxime by aerosol spray was associated with drug levels in nasal secretions that 1 h later averaged 750-fold higher than those inhibitory for rhinoviruses in vitro (0.2 ,ug/ml). However, administration of intranasal enviroxime (one spray per nostril, five times per day) to susceptible volunteers, beginning 1 day before and continuing for 4 days after virus exposure, did not significantly reduce infection or illness due to experimentally induced rhinovirus type 39 infection. The combined results of two separate trials yielded an infection rate of 100%o for 21 placebo-treated and 89% for 19 enviroxime-treated subjects. Approximately one-half of the volunteers in each group had seroconversion to the challenge virus. Overall, 52% of the placebo-treated and 53% of the enviroxime-treated subjects developed colds. No significant differences in symptom scores, nasal mucus weights, or numbers of nasal tissues used were observed between the two groups. Two-thirds of the enviroxime-treated volunteers noted intranasal irritation immediately after sprays, as compared with only one-third of the placebo-treated subjects.Enviroxime, 2-amino-1-(isopropyl sulphonyl)-6-benzimidazole phenyl ketone oxime (Lilly Research Laboratories, Indianapolis, Ind.), is a potent, specific inhibitor of rhinovirus replication in cell culture and in organ cultures of human embryonic nasal epithelium (5). Philpotts et al. have reported that combined oral and intranasal administration of enviroxime before and for 5 days after an experimental rhinovirus type 9 infection is associated with trends toward reduction in cold symptoms and quantitative virus shedding, as well as significant decreases in nasal mucus production, as compared with placebos (8). However, gastrointestinal side effects in the enviroxime-treated subjects, including vomiting and abdominal pain, limit the acceptability of the oral route of drug administration (8).The current studies were undertaken to determine the intranasal pharmacokinetics and tolerability of topically applied and orally administered enviroxime and the prophylactic effectiveness of intranasal administration in experimentally induced rhinovirus type 39 infection. After topical application to the nasal mucosa, enviroxime concentrations in nasal secretions exceeded those inhibitory for rhinovirus in vitro (0.2 ,ug/ml) by a factor of at least 50-fold up to 6 h after administration. However, by the method of administration used in this study, enviroxime did not prevent either infection or illness after experimental rhinovirus challenges in which either high or low inocula were used.MATERIALS AND METHODS Drug. Enviroxime was supplied by Lilly Research Laboratories as a 1% solution containing 10% ethyl alcohol, 1% menthol, and Emulphor, a water-soluble, oil-based wetting agent. The drug was dispensed in aerosol form from pressurized containers which delivered an average of 284 ,ug per spray. The propellant was an equal-parts (50:50) mixture of Freon-11 and Freon-12. In the volunteer tria...
Intranasal administration of enviroxime by aerosol spray was associated with drug levels in nasal secretions that 1 h later averaged 750-fold higher than those inhibitory for rhinoviruses in vitro (0.2 ,ug/ml). However, administration of intranasal enviroxime (one spray per nostril, five times per day) to susceptible volunteers, beginning 1 day before and continuing for 4 days after virus exposure, did not significantly reduce infection or illness due to experimentally induced rhinovirus type 39 infection. The combined results of two separate trials yielded an infection rate of 100%o for 21 placebo-treated and 89% for 19 enviroxime-treated subjects. Approximately one-half of the volunteers in each group had seroconversion to the challenge virus. Overall, 52% of the placebo-treated and 53% of the enviroxime-treated subjects developed colds. No significant differences in symptom scores, nasal mucus weights, or numbers of nasal tissues used were observed between the two groups. Two-thirds of the enviroxime-treated volunteers noted intranasal irritation immediately after sprays, as compared with only one-third of the placebo-treated subjects.Enviroxime, 2-amino-1-(isopropyl sulphonyl)-6-benzimidazole phenyl ketone oxime (Lilly Research Laboratories, Indianapolis, Ind.), is a potent, specific inhibitor of rhinovirus replication in cell culture and in organ cultures of human embryonic nasal epithelium (5). Philpotts et al. have reported that combined oral and intranasal administration of enviroxime before and for 5 days after an experimental rhinovirus type 9 infection is associated with trends toward reduction in cold symptoms and quantitative virus shedding, as well as significant decreases in nasal mucus production, as compared with placebos (8). However, gastrointestinal side effects in the enviroxime-treated subjects, including vomiting and abdominal pain, limit the acceptability of the oral route of drug administration (8).The current studies were undertaken to determine the intranasal pharmacokinetics and tolerability of topically applied and orally administered enviroxime and the prophylactic effectiveness of intranasal administration in experimentally induced rhinovirus type 39 infection. After topical application to the nasal mucosa, enviroxime concentrations in nasal secretions exceeded those inhibitory for rhinovirus in vitro (0.2 ,ug/ml) by a factor of at least 50-fold up to 6 h after administration. However, by the method of administration used in this study, enviroxime did not prevent either infection or illness after experimental rhinovirus challenges in which either high or low inocula were used.MATERIALS AND METHODS Drug. Enviroxime was supplied by Lilly Research Laboratories as a 1% solution containing 10% ethyl alcohol, 1% menthol, and Emulphor, a water-soluble, oil-based wetting agent. The drug was dispensed in aerosol form from pressurized containers which delivered an average of 284 ,ug per spray. The propellant was an equal-parts (50:50) mixture of Freon-11 and Freon-12. In the volunteer tria...
Viral infections are among the greatest causes of human morbidity, and it is estimated that in developed countries more than 60% of all the episodes of human illness result from viral infections. High virus infection rates also occur among pets, livestock, and plants. The high morbidity and the resulting economic loss caused by these infections have generated tremendous efforts in recent years to develop antiviral agents. Since viruses propagate only within living cells, the development of antiviral drugs which would disrupt the viral replication without affecting the metabolism of the host cell was initially believed to be difficult, if not impossible. However, dramatic progress in viral molecular biology has now made it possible to identify enzymatic processes which are unique to virus‐infected cells. As a consequence, it is becoming feasible to design chemical compounds which identify infected cells, block a specific step in viral replication, and leave uninfected cells unharmed. The majority of antiviral drugs which are under clinical development today generally interrupt viral nucleic acid synthesis. These compounds possess considerable selectivity against virus‐induced enzymes. This article discusses agents exhibiting significant antiviral activity against viral infections in animal model systems. One of the simplest molecules found to inhibit the replication of DNA viruses in animals is phosphonoformic acid (PFA), CH 3 O 5 P. PFA has undergone clinical evaluation in humans for the treatment of recurrent genital herpes, hepatitis B viral infection, and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), as well as cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection of bone marrow and renal transplant patients. Levamisole (6‐phenyl‐2,3,5,6‐tetrahydroimidazol[2,1‐ b ]thiazole), C 11 H 12 N 2 S, was found to be effective against herpes virus infections in humans. Several pyrimidine bases have been found to inhibit herpes virus‐induced keratitis in rabbits, eg, 2‐amino‐4,6‐dichloropyrimidine, C 4 H 3 Cl 2 N 3 , and 1‐allyl‐6‐chloro‐3,5‐diethyluracil, C 11 H 15 ClN 2 O 2 . The most successful clinical antiviral agents belong to the nucleoside category. Nucleoside analogues with potent antiviral activity have been known since idoxuridine and trifluridine were shown to be efficacious against herpes keratitis more than 30 years ago. However, the therapeutic usefulness of these early nucleosides was limited because of mutagenic, teratogenic, carcinogenic, cytostatic, or cytotoxic side effects. Recently the specificity of antiviral action of this class of compounds has been significantly improved; potent and highly selective nucleoside antiviral agents have now been developed. These include cytosine derivatives, purine nucleoside derivatives, adenine derivatives, and acyclic purine nucleosides. Among agents active against RNA viruses, 1,2‐bis(5‐methoxy‐2‐benzimidazol‐2‐yl)‐1,2‐ethanediol, C 18 H 18 N 4 O 4 , was found to be active against an experimentally induced rhino virus infection in chimpanzees. However, the in vivo antiviral efficacy was accompanied by significant toxicity. Amantadine hydrochloride (1‐adamantanamine hydrochloride), \documentclass{article}\usepackage{amssymb}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}${{\rm{C}}{\rm{H}}{\rm{N}}{\rm{{\cdot{}}}}{\rm{HCl}}1710}$\end{document} , is a narrow‐spectrum agent active only against influenza A virus. It became the first antiviral drug available for systemic use in the United States when it was approved by the FDA in 1966 for use against Asian influenza. A structurally related drug, rimantadine hydrochloride, (α‐methyl‐1‐adamantanemethylamine hydrochloride), \documentclass{article}\usepackage{amssymb}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}${{\rm{C}}{\rm{H}}{\rm{N}}{\rm{{\cdot{}}}}{\rm{HCl}}2112}$\end{document} , is widely used in Russia to treat influenza A virus. Lipophilic β‐diketones have exhibited significant in vivo activity against a number of RNA viruses, and adenosine and guanosine analogues have been found to be active against both RNA and DNA viruses. One of the broad‐spectrum antiviral agents that emerged from ICN Pharmaceuticals is an azole ribonucleoside, 1‐β‐ D ‐ribofuranosyl‐1,2,4‐triazole‐3‐carboxamide, designated as ribavirin, C 8 H 12 N 4 O 5 . Ribavirin has been studied in more animals and against more viruses than any other antiviral agent known today. It is active in cell culture against approximately 85% of all viruses studied. Viral strains susceptible to ribavirin have not been found to develop a resistance to the drug. The resistance against ribavirin is less likely because the drug exhibits multiple sites of antiviral action. Retroviruses as a class are often found to be responsible for persistent viral infections. Retroviruses are unique RNA viruses characterized by the transcription of their single‐stranded RNA into the double‐stranded DNA of the host cell using the viral enzyme reverse transcriptase. AIDS is an example of such a persistent and latent human viral infection. Following the identification of a retrovirus, HIV, as the etiological agent of AIDS, an intense effort has been made to identify drugs for the treatment or prevention of this debilitating, lethal disease. Several 2′,3′‐dideoxyribonucleosides of purine and pyrimidine were discovered to be potent inhibitors of HIV replication in vitro . Considerable data has also accumulated on in vitro antiHIV testing of acyclic and carbocyclic nucleoside analogues. 3′‐Azido‐3′‐deoxythymidine (retrovir, zidovudine, AZT), C 10 H 13 N 5 O 4 , 2,′3′‐dideoxycytidine (DDC), C 9 H 13 N 3 O 3 , and 2′,3′‐dideoxyinosine (DDI), C 10 H 12 N 4 O 3 , have become widely available for the treatment of AIDS and approved by the FDA for treatment of advanced AIDS cases.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.