2018
DOI: 10.1080/10705511.2018.1527223
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Actor–Partner Interdependence Model for Longitudinal Dyadic Data: An Implementation in the SEM Framework

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The L-APIMs with autoregressive effects currently do not allow to include the partner's lagged dependent outcome as predictor (Gistelinck & Loeys, 2020). Moreover, Level 1 errors were assumed to be independent over time, however, users might be interested in modeling serial dependency by including autocorrelated within-individual errors (see e.g., Gistelinck and Loeys (2019)). Finally, other non-linear L-APIMs (e.g., including piecewise linear actor and partner effects) have not been included (yet).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The L-APIMs with autoregressive effects currently do not allow to include the partner's lagged dependent outcome as predictor (Gistelinck & Loeys, 2020). Moreover, Level 1 errors were assumed to be independent over time, however, users might be interested in modeling serial dependency by including autocorrelated within-individual errors (see e.g., Gistelinck and Loeys (2019)). Finally, other non-linear L-APIMs (e.g., including piecewise linear actor and partner effects) have not been included (yet).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that other sets of restrictions have been proposed in the literature that allow for auto-dependency of the errors Gistelinck and Loeys (2019), but these can not be imposed with the package nlme.…”
Section: Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The importance of partners supporting the patient in the programme is often ignored; however, improving the perceptions of illness on the part of partners of heart attack patients may have important implications not only for patients' recovery [5], but also for improving partners' lifestyle habits [18]. For this reason, it is important to focus on analysing the influence of interpersonal behaviours of the partners [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Positive caregiver support can help to facilitate recovery and adjustment following an acute cardiac event [18], and researchers have long advocated the merit of evaluating inter-partner influences over time [19,20], but to date most studies have been conducted in cancer care or with older adults [21][22][23]. Although there have been some cross-sectional dyadic studies in cardiac populations [20][21][22][23][24], there is currently a paucity of longitudinal research examining how caregivers perceive cardiac patients' illness and rehabilitation and how this impacts on both parties at the dyadic level. Thus, simultaneous exploration of patient and caregiver perceptions, informed by the study of patient-caregiver dyads, is both necessary and justified.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%