1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0009-9260(99)90845-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The acute reversal sign: Comparison of medical and non-accidental injury patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the current study sought to compare the magnitude and time course of the concentrations of NSE, S100B and MBP after pediatric hypoxic-ischemic brain injury, iTBI and nTBI, in order to improve our understanding of the biochemical similarities and differences between them. Based on previous research in our laboratory [Berger et al, 2002 and because of the clinical, radiographic and histopathologic evidence of an important hypoxic-ischemic component to the injury in some cases of iTBI [Ewing-Cobbs et al, 2000;Johnson et al, 1995;Rao et al, 1999;Starling et al, 1995], we hypothesized that the magnitude of the increase in serum concentrations of these biomarkers would not differ between the different mechanisms of injury, but that the time course of the biomarkers after iTBI would mirror that seen after hypoxic-ischemic brain injury.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, the current study sought to compare the magnitude and time course of the concentrations of NSE, S100B and MBP after pediatric hypoxic-ischemic brain injury, iTBI and nTBI, in order to improve our understanding of the biochemical similarities and differences between them. Based on previous research in our laboratory [Berger et al, 2002 and because of the clinical, radiographic and histopathologic evidence of an important hypoxic-ischemic component to the injury in some cases of iTBI [Ewing-Cobbs et al, 2000;Johnson et al, 1995;Rao et al, 1999;Starling et al, 1995], we hypothesized that the magnitude of the increase in serum concentrations of these biomarkers would not differ between the different mechanisms of injury, but that the time course of the biomarkers after iTBI would mirror that seen after hypoxic-ischemic brain injury.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Our understanding of the injury sustained in iTBI has been provided through clinical observations [Johnson et al, 1995], confessions of perpetrators [Starling et al, 2004], radiographic data [Ewing-Cobbs et al, 2000;Rao et al, 1999] and histopathologic studies from children with fatal injuries [Geddes et al, 2001]. The clinical, radiographic and histopathologic information obtained from these sources suggests that hypoxemia may play an important role in the pathophysiology of iTBI.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If a causal relationship between hypoxia-ischaemia associated with cardiorespiratory arrest and SDH is confirmed, the significance of SDHs seen in infants admitted with unexplained encephalopathy and who are found to have SDHs on admission brain imaging may have potentially profound medicolegal implications. So far, this association has been generated by research emanating from neuropathological sources and has not been supported by widespread clinical experience, the general literature of hypoxicischaemic encephalopathy in early life [3,4], radiological literature [5][6][7][8][9][10] and a recent multicentre multinational post-mortem (PM) examination study [11]. It is particularly pertinent that the extensive imaging literature relating to radiological manifestations of hypoxic-ischaemic injury in early life does not refer to or identify SDH as a component of the injury spectrum or as a sequela.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a series of children with intracranial lesions following non-accidental trauma, a fracture was seen in only 45% of the cases and an intracranial lesion was seen in 56% of a series of patients with a fracture [15]. In Rao's series of 47 children with non-accidental injury, there was no evidence of fracture or scalp haematoma in 31 of them [16]. In a series of 87 children with skull fractures, 67 were neurologically normal [17]; 32 of them underwent brain CT and only 6 (19%) had evidence of small focal haemorrhage near the fracture.…”
Section: Skull X-raymentioning
confidence: 94%