2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10803-019-04302-8
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Adapted ADOS: A New Module Set for the Assessment of Minimally Verbal Adolescents and Adults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
34
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…ASD diagnoses were confirmed with the ADOS‐2 or A‐ADOS [Bal et al, 2019; Lord et al, 2012] and the Social Communication Questionnaire (SCQ) [Rutter, Bailey, & Lord, 2003], completed by parents. Non‐verbal IQ was assessed with the Leiter International Performance Scales‐Revised (Leiter‐R) [Roid & Miller, 1997], and adaptive behavior was assessed using the parent questionnaire version of the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale‐2 (VABS‐2) [Sparrow, Cicchetti, & Balla, 2005].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ASD diagnoses were confirmed with the ADOS‐2 or A‐ADOS [Bal et al, 2019; Lord et al, 2012] and the Social Communication Questionnaire (SCQ) [Rutter, Bailey, & Lord, 2003], completed by parents. Non‐verbal IQ was assessed with the Leiter International Performance Scales‐Revised (Leiter‐R) [Roid & Miller, 1997], and adaptive behavior was assessed using the parent questionnaire version of the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale‐2 (VABS‐2) [Sparrow, Cicchetti, & Balla, 2005].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants who did not use multiclause functional speech or complex sentences, but rather single words and simple phrase speech, were classified as ASD‐MLV ( N = 47) and were administered the ADOS Module 1 or 2. ASD‐MLV participants aged 5 to 12 ( n = 24) were assessed with the ADOS‐2 [Lord et al, 2012], while participants aged 12 to 21 ( n = 23) were assessed with the Adapted ADOS—an ADOS version designed to provide more age‐appropriate materials for minimally and low verbal adolescents and adults [Bal et al, 2020]. The remainder of participants used multiclause functional and complex speech and were classified as ASD‐V ( N = 36).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fifty ASD participants (28 ASD‐V, 22 ASD‐MLV) were enrolled in this study and their data were collected over one to four lab visits. The clinical diagnosis was confirmed with the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS), Second Edition Modules 3 and 4 [Lord et al, 2012] for ASD‐V participants and Adapted ADOS Modules 1 and 2 [Bal et al, 2020] for ASD‐MLV participants, administered and scored by an ADOS research‐reliable experimenter. Group assignment was based on expressive language [Bal, Katz, Bishop, & Krasileva, 2016].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%