1990
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1990.tb00539.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The adaptedness of the floral phenotype in a relict endemic, hawkmoth-pollinated violet. 1. Reproductive correlates of floral variation

Abstract: This paper examines the relationship between quantitative variation in floral morphology (sizes of petals, spur and peduncle) and maternal reproductive success (seed production) in Viola cazorlensic (Violaceae), a narrowly endemic violet of south-eastern Spain pollinated by day-flying hawkmoths (Sphingidae). This plant is characterized by broad intraspecific variation in size and proportions of floral parts. Floral morphology does not influence significantly the probability of fruit set. Among flowers setting … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

3
30
1
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
30
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…r Ͻ 0.50 Price and Boag 1987). Spur length was included in the analyses because it was the only floral character measured (except for the nectar traits, see below) and flower depth has been found to be sensitive to selection in several plants ( Nilsson 1988;Schemske and Horvitz 1989;Steiner and Whitehead 1990;Campbell 1991;Johnson and Steiner 1997; but see Herrera 1990). In addition, there are clear patterns of differentiation in spur length among northern European P. bifolia populations, with the spur length varying geographically with the pollinator tongue length (L. A.…”
Section: Choice Of Characters In Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…r Ͻ 0.50 Price and Boag 1987). Spur length was included in the analyses because it was the only floral character measured (except for the nectar traits, see below) and flower depth has been found to be sensitive to selection in several plants ( Nilsson 1988;Schemske and Horvitz 1989;Steiner and Whitehead 1990;Campbell 1991;Johnson and Steiner 1997; but see Herrera 1990). In addition, there are clear patterns of differentiation in spur length among northern European P. bifolia populations, with the spur length varying geographically with the pollinator tongue length (L. A.…”
Section: Choice Of Characters In Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schemske and Horvitz (1989) found selection for less flower depth in bee-pollinated Calathea ovandensis in one of three years. However, Herrera (1990Herrera ( , 1993 found no selection on spur length in natural populations of the hawkmoth-pollinated V. cazorlensis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, in the literature, tbere are examples of botb consistency of pollination ecotypes related to proboscis lengtb (e.g. Robertson & Wyatt, 1990, for butterflies;Suzuki, 1992, for bees), and independence between tbem, even for species witb flower tubes mucb longer tban N. tazetta (Herrera, 1990a). In any case, wbile we bave no adaptational explanation for tbe longer tubes in bill populations, we can suggest that tbese plants are not selected against in relation to tbe rewards for nectar-seeking insects.…”
Section: Floral Morphology and Pollination Ecotypesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One possible approach to test the adaptiveness of floral traits is to ask if individual variation translates into differential reproductive success (Harding, 1970;Waser & Price, 1981;Thomson & Stratton, 1985;Stanton, Snow & Handel, 1986;Stanton & Preston, 1988;Nilsson, 1988;Galen & Newport, 1988;Herrera, 1990b). O n the other hand, where significant floral variation occurs between populations, a further approach would consist of examining whether this variation correlates with changes in the identity of pollinators.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%