2010
DOI: 10.1117/12.858229
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The adaptive secondary mirror for the Large Binocular Telescope: optical acceptance test and preliminary on-sky commissioning results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, MagAO's successful Electro Mechanical acceptance tests in June 2010 proved that the MagAO 585 ASM has larger stroke (±15 µm), a thinner shell (at 1.6 mm vs. 2.0 mm), half the "go to" time (<0.7-1.0ms; with electronic damping), 2-5 nm rms of positional accuracy (by use of a 70 kHz capacitive closedloop), and just 30 nm rms of residual optical static polishing errors (compared to ~100 nm rms on the current MMT shell). These improvements are taken advantage of by LBTAO as well (Riccardi et al 2010), but MagAO's mirror overall is slightly better behaved compared to LBT (MagAO's lack of 87 slower "outer ring" LBT actuators increases its speed w.r.t LBT). Moreover, MagAO's ASM is much more flexible than any other ASM, while also not having the inner "stressed" hole illuminated (due to the 0.29 central obscuration of Magellan).…”
Section: The 2 Nd Generation 585 Element Asm For Magaomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, MagAO's successful Electro Mechanical acceptance tests in June 2010 proved that the MagAO 585 ASM has larger stroke (±15 µm), a thinner shell (at 1.6 mm vs. 2.0 mm), half the "go to" time (<0.7-1.0ms; with electronic damping), 2-5 nm rms of positional accuracy (by use of a 70 kHz capacitive closedloop), and just 30 nm rms of residual optical static polishing errors (compared to ~100 nm rms on the current MMT shell). These improvements are taken advantage of by LBTAO as well (Riccardi et al 2010), but MagAO's mirror overall is slightly better behaved compared to LBT (MagAO's lack of 87 slower "outer ring" LBT actuators increases its speed w.r.t LBT). Moreover, MagAO's ASM is much more flexible than any other ASM, while also not having the inner "stressed" hole illuminated (due to the 0.29 central obscuration of Magellan).…”
Section: The 2 Nd Generation 585 Element Asm For Magaomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The test was devoted to the system optical qualification in a 1g, laboratory conditions environment, before the thermo-vacuum tests. Here, we will briefly recall some general points about the optical calibration of a deformable mirror (DM) for AO: some references (related to the Large Binocular Telescope and Very Large Telescope DMs) may be found in [5] and [6]. As explained in the previous sections, the OBB is controlled by mean of a Feed Forward or stiffness matrix, whose eigenfunctions are the system stiffness modes; such functions provide a natural control basis for the system.…”
Section: B Optical Calibration In 1g Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AS are currently in operations/commissioning at 8m class telescopes (e.g. LBT [1], VLT [2], Magellan [3]) and are included in the optical design of the E-ELT [4] and GMT [5]. From this starting point, we investigated a strategy to design deformable primary mirrors (PM) with the goal to provide space telescopes with active wavefront controlled optic surfaces able to compensate the in-orbit thermoelastic bending and the release of the gravity deformations.…”
Section: The Latt Way: From Adaptive Secondary To Space Active Primentioning
confidence: 99%