LETTER TO THE EDITORReply to second letter to the editor about the article ''The addition of blood flow restriction to resistance exercise in individuals with knee pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis''We appreciate the comments by Korokakis et al. 1 on our article 'The addition of blood flow restriction to resistance exercise in individuals with knee pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis'. 2 We would like to take the opportunity to address several points raised in these comments which adds to the discussion that this review already generated. 3,4 First, we do not agree with the comment 'Although the authors reported that they conducted the review following recommendations in the Cochrane Handbook, there are some important departures, which have likely introduced biases and inconsistencies. . .' Our systematic review was performed according to the recommendations of the Cochrane Handbook and the PRISMA statement, which are the current guideline recommendations regarding systematic review design and methodologies. 5,6 In addition, the results of the analysis of pooled data as performed by Korokakis et al 1 and illustrated in their Figures (Figure 1A, p= 0.94, Figure 1B, p=0.65) seem to be consistent with our conclusion of a lack of effect of blood flow restriction (BFR) flow restriction.Second, despite the fact that the extracted data used different scales and scores, it was possible to perform a meta-analysis, according to the recommendations of the current Cochrane Handbook, using standardised mean differences to unify and adjust the values. Although this is not ideal and could be a source of heterogeneity, it allowed assessing the data in a more categorical manner with quantitative results. 5 Additionally, it was suggested that we should have included the study by Tennent et al. 7 Considering that its effect measures are expressed in medians and interquartile range, this is why it was not possible to include these data in the meta-analysis with our other data using RevMan 5.3