2019
DOI: 10.1177/1082013219871410
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The addition of golden flaxseed flour (Linum usitatissimum L.) in chicken burger: Effects on technological, sensory, and nutritional aspects

Abstract: Five different concentrations of golden flaxseed flour (0%: F0 (control), 5%: F1, 10%: F2, 15%: F3, 20%: F4) were used as a functional ingredient to replace the fat in chicken burgers. The products were analyzed for moisture, protein, carbohydrate, fat, ash, shear force, consumer acceptance, and their sensory and technological characteristics. The fat, carbohydrate, and protein contents of the raw hamburgers did not differ significantly. An increase in golden flaxseed flour concentration caused a decrease in m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Formulation NA3 presented the lowest cooking yield compared to the other formulations (Table 4). However, all formulations had yields above 80%, as observed by Huber (2012) for chicken burger patties with the addition of plant fibers as a fat substitute and Cócaro et al (2019) for chicken burger patties with and without the addition of flaxseed meal, indicating that the yield values are within the expected range for this type of product. The formulations showed no difference (p>0.05) regarding shrinkage (Table 4).…”
Section: Formulationssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Formulation NA3 presented the lowest cooking yield compared to the other formulations (Table 4). However, all formulations had yields above 80%, as observed by Huber (2012) for chicken burger patties with the addition of plant fibers as a fat substitute and Cócaro et al (2019) for chicken burger patties with and without the addition of flaxseed meal, indicating that the yield values are within the expected range for this type of product. The formulations showed no difference (p>0.05) regarding shrinkage (Table 4).…”
Section: Formulationssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Among the assessed meatballs enriched with plant additives, the highest hardness was found in group M 3 of meatballs with the highest proportion of non-husked linseeds. An increase in hardness (increase in sheer force) of poultry burgers enriched with linseed flour and an increase in the hardness of burgers with an increase in the used additive was demonstrated by Cocaro et al [ 42 ]. The increase in hardness measured by the TPA test of meat products enriched with plant additives (hemp and linseed seeds) was confirmed in the study by Zając and Świątek [ 41 ], with hemp ingredients by Zając et al [ 29 ], and with amaranth flour by Faid [ 26 ] and Tamsen et al [ 10 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The addition of a mixture (M 2 ) with equal proportions of seeds as a substitute for a wheat roll (WR) caused a significant ( p ≤ 0.05) increase in the ash content in poultry meatballs ( Table 3 ). In studies by Billek and Turchan 23], Nowello et al [ 11 ], and Cócaro et al, [ 42 ] the addition of linseed in the form of seeds or flour increased the ash content in meat products.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The frying process increased the hardness of all groups (P < 0.05), while the adhesiveness, cohesiveness, and springiness were not affected by frying (P > 0.05). In fried, linseed-contained burgers, the hardness and adhesiveness was decreased compared to the control, which may be due to the gel production and higher WHC [35].…”
Section: Texture Analysismentioning
confidence: 88%