2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrex.2008.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The additional value of magnetic resonance imaging in suspected saddle deformity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They conclude that pain relief is achieved by mechanical disruption of the adhesions by the volume of the injectate in the fascial planes [8]. Van der Veen also reported on one case treated conservatively with cortisone injections [5].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They conclude that pain relief is achieved by mechanical disruption of the adhesions by the volume of the injectate in the fascial planes [8]. Van der Veen also reported on one case treated conservatively with cortisone injections [5].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Blunt trauma to the distal part of the hand has been described as a causal factor to this condition [1,2]. Furthermore, the condition has occasionally been reported as post-infectious and postinflammatory [3][4][5]. There are few reports in the literature about this condition, and most of them are limited to case reports with a short follow-up (see Table 2).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the cases in the comprehensive Chicarilli report, 10% are referred to as miscellaneous [ 2 ]. Other exceptions are local inflammation [ 4 ] and inflammation after a complex regional pain syndrome [ 5 ]. The symptomatic interosseous-lumbrical adhesion in our case was caused by a local infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also van der Veen et al . reported a case with MRI findings suggesting the diagnosis [ 5 ]. The MRI in our case was not helpful, other than excluding differential diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%